Wow, you really took an interest in the fact that I used the word dialectics. Did you learn a new word?
All your repeated dishonest blathering has gotten repetitive (big fucking surprise). I leave you to your cesspool =). Enjoy it, you pedantic twit. John > On Nov 5, 2016, at 2:53 PM, juan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 07:11:30 -0400 > John Newman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:20 PM, juan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> russian propaganda. >>> I simply ignore it. >> >> You certainly do. Blatant statist bullshit pours into and through the >> list and Juan the protector simply ignores it. > > > Yep, and that annoys people like you =) > > Notice that I'm not the only one in the list who isn't bothered > by russian propaganda or that openly acknowledges that you > americunts are the ones messing with the russians. > > You on the other hand seem to blatantly ignore the existence of > your americunt empire and its actions... > > > >> >> But if someone mentions global warming.... or science at a >> professional level (and Russia has universities too), watch the fuck >> out. Someone's about to get called americunt =) >> >>> But of course, I'm not going to do your job, you dumb lefty >>> americunt. My beef is with scumbags like you - a me ri cunts. >>> There are no pro-russia local facists in argentina. There are >>> lots of pro-amerikkka fascists tho. >> >> Oh, I see. You have a remarkable ability to distinguish amongst and >> identify different types of fascists. It's good to know someone is >> keeping Argentina pure. (lol) > > > argentina is a fascist cesspool and virtual colonoy of your > americunt empire - I never suggested there's anything 'pure' > about argentina. Only a retard like you would get a different > idea. > > >> >>> >>> americunts like you don't like to be called americunts - that's >>> a great reason to point out that you are an ameriCUNT. >> >> And you're just a cunt, but I don't need to say it 13 times per >> message =). > > your choice =) > > >> >>> >>>> Particularly as I've >>>> never had a single good word to say for America, or any other >>>> nation state. As you know of course, you dishonest fuck. >>> >>> As I said you are way more pro ameriKKKA than I'm pro russia. >>> But since you are a dishonest fuck... =) >> >> You simply ignore Russian fascism - you just said so. You give it a >> pass. It doesn't bother you in the least. > > I said I ignore the dumb russian propaganda on the list - That > I give russian fascism a pass is just a lie on your part. > > And I'll remark again that some of it is not even propaganda. > For instance, only dumb americunts would believe that the > russians hacked the democratic fascist party. > > But no doubt, a fascist americunt would equate > "not-believing-US-propaganda" with "giving-the-russians-a-pass" > > >> >> I'm not pro any nation state. I don't give Russia or America a pass. > > Too bad that's a blatant lie. You support state 'science', so > you 'give a pass' to all nation states on the planet. You just > do it in slightly underhanded way. > > >> Again, you argue like a child, so I'm indulging you like a child. > > lol...As if that was an insult. > > > >>> >>> Notice stupid scumbag how you both cheer for NATION STATE >>> 'science' while denying that you are a pro nation state statist >>> cunt. >>> >>> Yep, you are rather stupid john... >> >> I said : >> >> science is real. >> I don't know everything. >> And I implied there have been useful advances from university level >> sciences. > > Yes, and? All statist retards (like you) 'know' that given > enough subsidies, the parasites who get them might do something > 'useful' once in a while. So fucking what. > > I already addressed the point in the discussion with Tom. The > very same discussion full of points you can counter, and which > led you to start whining and call me a 'hypocrite' =) > > > >> >> I realize your chihuahua sized brain has problems with complex >> thoughts, but I wonder what part of that counts as cheerleading? > > > What are you doing, exactly, if not cheerleading for > statist 'science' when all you have to reply to somebody > criticizing it, is : > > "you are typying on a computer" (as if that meant anything). > > > You should apply that line of 'reasoning' to yourself. ANY > criticism of the establishment, done using ANY medium that > fucktards like you think exist thanks to the state is invalid. > > Is the thought too complex for you? Again : Using anything that > had anything to do with any subsidy invalidates any argument > against the establishmet (in your deranged mind) > > And what's the logical conclusion of that absurd premise? Why, > you either become a pro-establishment, or you are a 'hypocrite'. > > Are you going to call this 'dialectics'? Oh, wait : > > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dialectics > > " The art or practice of arriving at the truth by the exchange > of logical arguments." > > No wonder you would use 'dialectics' as a derogative term. > > > >> Yep, you are completely full of shit Juan.... >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> I find it hilarious how much you disparage the crypto list. >>> >>> >>> Yes, I fail to appreciate its cosmic virtue, namely CENSORSHIP. >>> A virtue you fully embrace, like a good dumb americunt. >> >> There is a difference between censorship and a moderated technical >> mailing list. > > You are sick piece of shit John =) > > You are seriously trying to 'argue' along the lines of "war is > peace" and trying to sell CENSORSHIP by changing its name. > > That's both highly stupid and obviously a core totalitarian > value that one would think is not a 'cypherpunk' value. > > Who else advocates 'moderation' aka censorship here? Why, your > fascist american brother quinn. That should tell you > something.... > > >> Kind of like no sane person would give you commit privs >> to any source code, anywhere. >> >> The idea that an individual list admin's agency, in the configuration >> of their own software, is dictated by Juan and his central committee >> - that's fascism. > > > Sure. Free specech is fascism. That's the kind of thought that > fascist cunts like you freely utter with a straight face. Only > americunt anti-culture can produce bots like you John =) > > > It's also funny that you are fully aligned with the most > right-wing right wingers and their "my home my rules" slogan. > > > >> But Ive pointed this out to you before. >> >> Again, I wouldn't expect your over excited little frontal lobe, >> clearly suffering from serious deformity, to understand. >> >> And I still invite the "cesspool" comparison. This list has become a >> fucking cesspool, aided and abetted by you and your comrades. > > > Damn, Progressive American John is threatened by the russians! > Call homeland security and maccarthy now!!! > > >> >> >> John >
