To clarify ; you're a waste of time. I made a mistake (have made many actually) responding to you Zen.
My bad. -- John > On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> John Newman: >>>> read the links you sent? >>> >>> They ar as Zordon suggested >>> >>> "Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East >>> Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, >>> while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the >>> Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year" >>> >>> "They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of >>> years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East >>> Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time" >> >> And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been >> happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the >> article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be >> false. >> >> Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I >> said, bullshit. > > John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: > "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good > news" > > Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of > underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models). > > Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the > bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a > little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to > make compensatory consideration for your limitations. > > >>>> full of shit > > John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you > understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive > responses can also be made. > > This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd > funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to > draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd > probably draw it somewhat like "666". > > > Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed > in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may > assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, > like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better > that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for > your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/ > > > My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying > for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing > my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best > interest. > > > Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a > substantive response - railing against seekers because their > seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response > program is unlikely to raise the dailog, > Zenaan > Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning > > > -- > Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) > Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning > Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
