Moon of Alabama: > January 06, 2017 > > New Intelligence Report Adds No Evidence Of "Russian Hacking" (Updated) > > UPDATE: Up to today there is no public evidence that Russia hacked the > Democratic National Council and/or released DNC material to Wikileaks. > After today's new intelligence report (pdf) there is still no such > evidence. (One third of the report is dedicated to criticize the > Russian government's TV outlet Russia Today for criticizing Hillary > Clinton. The RT viewer numbers claimed in the report are evidently > false from 2012 and thereby completely irrelevant.) There are rather > wild assertions and a lot of conjecture but zero facts that could be > accepted as proof. > > End-update > > When Hillary Clinton was defeated in the U.S. presidential election > the relevant powers launched a campaign to delegitimize the President > elect Donald Trump. > > The ultimate aim of the cabal is to kick him out of office and have a > reliable replacement, like the Vice-President elect Pence, take over. > Should that not be possible it is hoped that the delegitimization will > make it impossible for Trump to change major policy trajectories > especially in foreign policy. A main issue here is the reorientation > of the U.S. military complex and its NATO proxies from the war of > terror towards a direct confrontation with main powers like Russia and > China. > > The cabal consists of President Obama, the defeated candidate Hillary > Clinton, neoconservatves like the State Department's cookie dispenser > Victoria Nuland, the Republican senators McCain and Lindsay and the > military-industrial complex. (One of the few neocons planted near to > Trump, former CIA director James Woolsey, threw the towel today and > left the Trump transition team.) > > A major role in directing the plot has fallen to Obama's consigliere > John Brennan, the current director of the CIA. Another role has been > delegated to the various military and NATO think tanks like the > Atlantic Council and the British RUSI and reliable proxies within the > media. > > The current emphasis of the campaign is on the release of emails and > papers from the Clinton campaign through Wikileaks. It is alleged that > some releases were gained through hacking, planned and executed by the > Russian government. Trump had announced that he plans to seek good > relations with Russia, the power that the cabal had earlier chosen as > the new enemy de jour. > > But there is a problem. There is no real evidence that a "hack" ever > happened. There is no evidence that Russia is involved. None at all. >
Analysis follows with lottsa links all over the page to pertinent dox... It IS interesting to note that one of the links leads to a little tidbit about how wrong Crowdstrike, the 'cyber-something' the FBI and DNC both apparently had a 'go-to' relationship with about the Russian non-hacks was totally wrong with another analysis they had done regarding a Russian hack on... wait for it... Ukraine iOT artillery. ..and the fact that Crowdstrike's founder/cto is Atlantic Council Senior Fellow Dmitri Alperovitch. The Atlantic Council is a NATO lobby repping Gulf governments, and defense industry companies http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/01/new-intelligence-report-adds-no-evidence-of-russian-hacking.html
