Wrong thread > https://theintercept.com/2016/11/29/something-happened-to-activist-email-provider-riseup-but-it-hasnt-been-compromised/
On 2017-01-20 05:44, Razer wrote: > > On 01/19/2017 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote: > >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13007234 >> >> Not as if anything should be thought untouchable. >> >> > > I saw something on a twitter feed related to them that said they would > be updating it and not to worry and this info is old. > > Have you checked? > > Check test 1 2... > > gpg --verify canary-statement-signed.txt > > gpg: Signature made Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:01:19 PM PDT using RSA key ID > 139A768E > gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks <[email protected]>" > gpg: aka "Riseup Treasurer <[email protected]>" > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 4E07 9126 8F7C 67EA BE88 F1B0 3043 E2B7 139A > 768E > > The canary hasn't been updated but the gpg output still shows a good > sig (assuming) > > They could still kill the canary be revoking the key, and they haven't > done that. > > See: https://riseup.net/en/canary > > Rr >
