On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:27:30PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:17:12PM +0900, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote: > > > We can have a shared (UN?) court > > Because fewer (but corruptible) institutions is better, right? > > > > for determining things like permissible pollution and settling > > lawsuits that are carried all the way up. For settling disputes > > between nations, and their adherence to global law. > > Sorry, all your one world / new world order shit can go to hell. > > Not going to happen. Not going to fly here. Not going to be consented > to by China nor Russia nor Australia. > > Simply, there's no point arguing for it any more since at the very > least BRICS has stamped an unstoppable foot on the world stage - we > are all going to get a multi-polar world, whether you Americans like > it or not. > > I might be powerful, but even -my- words cannot stop BRICS now.
Russian victory lap for the multi polar world: A Brave, New Multipolar World: Lavrov Declares End of US Regime Change Dominoes http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/brave-new-multipolar-world-lavrov-declares-end-us-regime-change-dominoes/ri18725 No significant insight yet from Zbig except "America should partner with China" which certainly seems rather 'yesterday' - perhaps the globalluminoligarchy has moved a bunch of their assets to the PROC?