Actually, people who think the NY Times is a Communist steered agitrag were responsible...
Just sayin'. Rr (Sorry about the top post... Not.) On 07/05/2017 07:53 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote: > It's hard to say whether it should be surprising that Operation > Northwoods was committed to paper on government letterhead. An > official government document proposing terrorism against the American > people. And throughout history there were 53 admitted false > flags: > http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/x-admitted-false-flag-attacks.html > . > > So it becomes fair to wonder what was so big about anthrax, and why > Matt deHart had to be arrested on trumped up charges. > > On Page 88 of Part 10 of 59 on the FBI's released Amerithrax > investigation, a psychological profile without letterhead is provided. > There are also presumably letters from Ivins against fat people near > the beginning of the PDF file. > > But if the CIA was responsible, would the FBI know, or would they have > been just doing their jobs? It's a pretty power argument for people > just doing their jobs when virtually every Nazi gave it as a reason. > You'd have the BAU giving facially a specific profile, but in reality > about 1% or so would qualify, so it'd fall under Schneier's arguments > for no terrorist catching system is effective (although clearly it > won't be completely automated). Then you'd have field agents under > pressure to solve the case, they might just be rationalizing why what > their doing is correct. > > For all it takes for Bruce Ivins to be falsely accused is for the CIA > to stay mum, and for the FBI to do their jobs? > > In proportion to the punishment, murder convictions are inaccurate, > one in nine are exonerated based on retested DNA evidence. The CSI > effect is quite fortunate, or that rate would be higher, the police > only gather enough evidence to ensure a conviction, not to ensure they > don't have an innocent person. The probability that OJ was guilty was > in all fairness, 40%. Another 40% it was Jason. 20% it could've been > anyone else. Legally, no prosecution for murder should succeed by > official standards.
