On 07/08/2017 11:23 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 07/07/2017 04:17 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote: > >> Patent 9,525,866, from 2016, is anti-camera forensics. Time to go back >> to film! (or maybe just resize it to 50% and save it as a rather lossy JPEG) > > I would not trust that very far: Signatures from hot pixels may remain > visible to the naked eye as well as statistical analysis, and variations > in color registration across larger areas of the sensor would survive.
[snip] Postscript: Or pay cash for a cheap toy camera, destroy the sensor and discard after use. Duh. Not always an option depending the situation, but probably the best one where practical. :o)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
