On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:27:25PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40:05AM +0800, James A. Donald wrote: > > On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 > > > "James A. Donald" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by > > > > enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, > > > > they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis, > > > > > > how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called > > > 'hidden' services? > > > > After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, > > which was then throttled down to > > unusuability. > > It is possible that Weev does not actually know that it takes at > least a few days, and really a few weeks, to build up a Tor-network > profile whereby other nodes and willing to accept significant traffic > from the new node - this is my understanding of how Tor relays work. > > It is of course also possible that there is an intended and targetted > clampdown on TDS. > > But the first step is to grok how Tor works, and eliminate such a > possibility. > > Ultimately, Tor has a crippled TCP underlying protocol/comms layer - > a new UDP (or even lower) protocol layer is ultimately needed so that > a free speech network becomes a proper switched network. But that's > another of those things that Tor "strangely" keeps failing to get > funding for...
s/Weev/the admin for stormfront/
