On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:29:49PM -0400, John Newman wrote: > > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:10 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Razer wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 08/30/2017 11:45 AM, grarpamp wrote: > >>> Just as with Dailystormer and dozens to hundreds > >>> of other controversial sites past and present, whether > >>> HTML, IRC, filesharing, or simple p2p messaging, > >>> Stormfront will be back online as a .i2p or .onion, > >>> or on whatever other censorship resistant overlay > >>> networks exist. > >>> > >>> These cryptos and nets are mainstream now, > >>> where others fail, expect them. > >> > >> I expect Fascism is eternal... > >> http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/ > >> > >> Ps. Promoting the extermination of anyone based on an unalterable trait > >> is a little 'above the bar' that would generally be called > >> "controversial" in ANY society. That's why these scumbag-operated > >> domains get shut down. > > > > Do you admit satire, black humour, any humour for that matter? > > > > So was it a “joke” when you repeatedly defended the Duterte death > squads, and spoke of him from your default point of view - a fascist > apologist? > > That was some pretty black humor, indeed ;)
You failed to respond in material particular at the time, and now you proclaim to be the humorous authority on what I said? Carry on with your hogwash John ... > > Are you able to distinguish humour as it arises from the internal > > causes of an individual human? > > > > And are you able to properly assess the nature of a human when you > > witness them type some words which can on their face, genuinely be > > interpreted as humorous by some other humans? > > > > Or is free humorous speech another one of these "less equal than > > other free speech" things just like you hold that some facts are less > > equeal than others? > > > Do you actually think you’re funny? Do you really need the thin > veil of “humor” for your noxious views? Just own that shit. I mean, > you are a joke - a bad, stale, unfunny sort of joke - but not in > the way you're trying to claim. > > > > P.S. I don’t support registrars and providers dropping sites for > posting the type of shit Zzz likes to read.. I hope shit calms > down and “silicon valley” realizes the mistakes they are making. > > > > >
