> On Aug 31, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:03 PM, John Newman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 30, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08/30/2017 05:54 PM, jim bell wrote: > <snip> >> Further, the jury is going to want to know why somebody in the crowd struck >> the vehicle. Malice? >> >> If you hit my vehicle... with a car or object, you ARE NOT entitled to run >> me over, maliciously or in 'perceived self-defense'. Case closed. Guilty of >> vehicular homicide. Intent unproven sans admission. >> >> So, what is your theory as to how a jury could convict the driver? Seems to >> me, the jury would want to convict the person who struck the car. >> >> Are you fucking serious ? >> >> Even if someone hits your car with a baseball bat, >> plowing into a group of people and killing someone is NOT >> an appropriate response. This nazi-murder-by-car apologetics >> is fucking head-scratching, to say the bare minimum. > > Defense Lawyer: > "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury - The defendant was in his vehicle, > unarmed and surrounded by hostile actors, and someone started > pounding on his vehicle. The defendant, believed that he was about > to have his windows smashed and himself dragged out of the vehicle > and beaten or even killed. > > "He panicked, and performed the only action he could come up with > to save his skin - he advanced at a high rate of speed to clear the way. > Unfortunately, someone died as a result. This is tragic, but he was > clearly > acting in self defense." > > Jury: > "???" > > I haven't seen the videos (the site that Jim Bell referenced make
Then why chime in? > reference to Trump as the God Emperor, which makes me itch something Gives me hives as well ;) > fierce - I couldn't stay on that site long enough to watch them), but > just suppose that the videos show that the car was indeed surrounded, > and that at least one person did start banging on it with some > implement or other. > > How do you think a jury would vote in that case? I don't know. Juries get it wrong all the time. That doesn't account for or otherwise exculpate the murder by car, except in the eyes of a really twisted American gulag. > It's not out of the realm of possibility that a reasonable jury would > vote Not Guilty - self defense. > > Kurt
