On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:13:14PM -0700, Razer wrote: > On 09/11/2017 04:35 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Godaddy's in-house survey monkey just hit me up. Thought it was a > > good time to express their lack of advising themselves in regard to > > the impact to their public image when they took a stand against TDS: > > > > > > > > - Why did you rate Godaddy the way you just did (low)? > > Godaddy took a stand against freedom of speech in rejecting > > TheDailyStormer.com's (TDS) domain registration, and GoDaddy did so > > in a way which failed to uphold one of our community's foundational > > freedoms. > > > > When undermining a fundamental human right, as Godaddy did to TDS, > > even if your target is speaking objectionably, Godaddy as an > > "information carrier" (of sorts) has a significantly higher duty of > > care to its customers (e.g. TDS) than other entities. > > > > Godaddy, in cancelling TDS' domain, failed to conduct itself in a way > > compatible with its duty of care obligations to our community to > > treat every body fairly and in a way which preserves due process. > > > > Godaddy should advise itself to inform itself of the requirements for > > conduct in relation to those of its customers who say things on their > > websites which Godaddy may object to. > > > > > > > > - What is the single most important thing we could do to improve your > > experience? > > Advise yourself that when you take a public stand against freedom of > > speech (even objectionable speech), you are affecting your reputation > > negatively, in a big way. Due to the TDS episode, my plans are to > > transition completely off of Godaddy in the coming 2 years. > > > The ShitSturmer got bounced for claiming
Oh? I'd ordinarily assume the good intention that you actually have a fact to back this up - but your record is rather lean on the "facts" dept "Razer". ProTip: "everybody knows" and "all major governments say so", are not, despite common misunderstandings, facts. ... > GoDaddy's management supported > their wrong opinion about Jews Blacks Catholics, Gypsies, and just about > everyone but Whitebread middleclass men. ... Example: your saying "I am a GoDaddy shill" would be a first-hand, "from personal knowledge" fact, whereas if I were to say "Weev, TDS's website administrator, nor Angling, it's founder, ever said any such as you claim, Razer", that could sound like a fact, but in actual fact it would merely be an assertion on my part. (Admittedly, as much as I'd like to claim that as a fact, I unfortunately have not quite crossed Occam's Razer's edge to capacity to prove uncertainties/ unknowables. You on the other hand should have no problem proving your positive assertion as it only requires one teensy weensy little example to verify your statement...) > I'll let Terry Allen. Austin's own Country Boy Hippie tell ya. > > The song is called "Big Ol' White Boys" > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=137&v=JP0tPchikYc At about 1.5x speed (from 2:20) is perfect - funny too :) ... > Live: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8h5VdIe33o > > ...but your pin head would probably explode. That's called an ad-hominem attack. You might have heard of it before - in fact, you might have used it before. ProTip: an ad-hominem attack is not a conversation "win", it's just a decent into personal attack. I reworded the last chorus of the first song for ya Razer: Sittin here on the banks of victim, lookin' out, at the White pride; Wonderin' if I'm ever gonna get 'em, believin' my "chosen people" lie! Big ole' bankers, fat and plunder, Livin' high on Zio creed; Rule the world while we get dummer, Fuel the fued by other's' needs.
