On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 03:59:01 -0400 grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 3:26 PM, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/canary_in_a_coal_mine > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQEIYjS1ePY > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA9FiL7mz_0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrEM3LHvjI0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxPYOZCY3pQ > > > 'illegal' content end up in jail. > > Opsec is hard. well yes. But the moment you try to blame tor's failure on 'other software' you reveal yourself as a tor shill. People who use tor to host 'illegal' content get caught. You can start the list of victims of the ameican nazis with "freedom hosting" and keep adding itms. The obvious conclusion is that tor is a honeypot. Also, your first comment about clearnet was a nonsensical diversion and now linking stupid videos just makes it clearer. > > > 'Honeypot' > > Vulnerability whitepapers are more objective. > Suspicion is harder to prove. it is a fact that people who do stuff that the US nazis don't like, and use tor, get caught. So yeah, honeypot. > Some rightly consider both as equally broken. > That's fine. Pick or build another darknet. > > > where's are the link to the 'uncensored' stuff on the 'dark web' > > 'powered' by tor's 'hidden' services? > > Seek and ye shall find whatever be yer fancy. right, there's no 'illegal' content on tor beca<use tor is compromised, owned and run by the americunts, with some help from european pieces of shit. 'allies' or colaborators. > > > this issue on tor's mailing list? > > Posters have spoken there on such topics from time to time. > Feel free to do similarly. lol - I'm banned from that cesspool and as you know very well the list is FULLY CENSORED, just like tor's blog or any other propaganda outlet those scumbags control. Do you get that? Tor's mailing lists are FULLY CENSORED. > > > party line? yes the tor/pentagon party line you keep robotically repeating.
