On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:13:57PM -0400, John Newman wrote: > > > > On Oct 17, 2017, at 4:39 PM, John Newman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:02:45AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:53:56PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > >>>> On 10/15/2017 10:50 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >>>> This is one of the best put together summaries of the ???Global > >>>> Warming??? (originally global cooling, now PC "climate change") debate > >>>> I've ever seen: > >>> > >>> Damn! Even I understood that!! Thanks! Ric > >> > >> Here's an even easier one - see the picture on page 8 (another little > >> doc put together by Gil May) - 4 pine trees grown in controlled > >> conditions with varying CO2 levels. > >> > >> Plants really needed the CO2 from the industrial revolution - > >> otherwise the levels were quite literally precariously low for life > >> on this planet. I'd like to see how long we'll be "right" for going > >> forward with the amount of plant food we've pumped into our > >> atmosphere. At least we're nearly out of the red zone... > > > > Who the fuck is Gil May? > > > > You are the most gullible idiot I've ever... wait, actually, you're > > quite representative of a bunch of gullible fucking morons that seem to > > dominate humanity. > > > > Link: > > > > https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/ > > > > See attached graph. > > <24_co2-graph-021116-768px.jpg> > > in case the significance doesn't dawn - look > at the time scale.
Thanks for your graph. Sorry for the docx file - I guess you were unable to open that first one properly, I've saved it as PDF (attached) - check out the graph on page 10, and note its timescale - it's another time scale again. These geologic time scales can be a little deceptive - you see a graph with a time scale of 400,000 years and think "oh wow, that's yuge! That's the bees knees of the facts we need to know" and then along comes another time scale - an order of magnitude greater. Oh wait, let me recalibrate - actually TWO orders of magnitude greater. So thinking you have the full picture is, of course, an easy mistake to make... Regards, Z
