On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:07:50AM +0000, \0xDynamite wrote: > > This is one of the best put together summaries of the “Global > > Warming” (originally global cooling, now PC "climate change") debate > > I've ever seen: > > > > ∙ the scare graphs used to create alarm > > Did you want us to encrypt that? > > > ∙ the big picture graphs showing the ruse in all its glory > > Are you saying that because there is hidden watermarked data? > > > -And- including the links to original sources, NOAA etc... > > Government coverup? > > > Mr May has put some real care into this - as good as it gets. > > Regarding the subject.... > > It's clear that the real issue regarding climate change is the > socio-spiritual affects of massive consumption without a care in the > world? YOU DON'T NEED DATA. > > It's like a suicidal patient: they don't need analysis of what's > wrong. The problem is too basic for people to see the obvious: > physical contact that isn't manipulative (taking anything in exchange) > or guarded (invoking socially-programmed counter-responses that > destroy any real hope of a connection).
Look there are many problems, socio-spiritual, material, and whatever else one wishes to categorize. Dumping CO2 into our Earth's atmosphere is not only not a problem, it's probably a really good thing right now - up to a point, of say 3000 to 5000 ppm - -then- we can start asking if it's a problem, and by then we'll have given up our plant food generators anyway... Debunking the “CO2 is evil” myth does not take away from any other problem. Your stated "socio-spiritual" problem may well be more important, but that's another topic from CO2 scare mongering. Regards,
