On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 19:38:09 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > From: juan <[email protected]> > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 18:51:39 +0000 (UTC) > jim bell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch Theirs is a > >> marvelous statement of the problem, but sadly it does not offer any > >> kind of solution. Therefore, I am convinced that HRW will view > >> positively my idea. > > > > Oh yes. I'm sure a proxy of the pentagon would > > love 'your idea'. You surely are not delusional eh Jim. > > > Human Rights watch is complaining about the ease with which the Fed > Courts can convict Federal defendants, a problem that has long been > known. They state the problem very well, focussing on the issue of > drug crimes. Yet, they do not even hint at a solution. Assuming > they are serious about wanting a solution (why should we suppose > otherwise?) We should suppose otherwise because if they really wanted a solution they would be doing something meaningful by now. But you are free to make any proposition to them I guess. Their answer might be entertaining. If they bother to return your call. > I will be showing up with a solution which might cost as > little as $10 million per year for the entire country. What's not > to like? So in the land of Free, if you cross a red light, the government will accuse you of 'money laundering', 'drug trafficking', 'sexism', 'mass murder' and some other things. You can confess and renounce your 'right' to a 'fair trial' or you can be charged with 100 more fake charges. I'm not seeing how $3000 per govt victim will fix that. The system is completely corrupt by design. And has been polished for hundreds of years. Good luck 'hacking' it. > > > And what sort of 'news' does HWR publish...let's see.... > > > https://www.hrw.org/the-day-in-human-rights/2017/10/27 > > > "Syrian Government Responsible for Chemical Attack" > > Yes? I am not vouching for the accuracy of anything else HRW > publishes. Fine. I just check the stuff they publish to learn what their agenda is... > > Surprusing! Chemically pure US military propaganda. Just the > > kind of stuff that non-delusional Jim Bell likes to > > promote...Jim was ranting about Syria IIRC. > > > So on second thougts it's hard to tell if HWR would be > > interested in 'your idea'. On one hand you are aligned > > with their fascist program. On the other hand, from the point > > of view of advertising, you are a liability.... > > You are being contradictory. You claim I'm "with" them, and then you > claim I'm not. Decide on a position and stick to it. Or maybe I'm just commenting on your contradictory position =P > > > The importance of the involvement of HRW will not be as > > a sole source of funding; rather, I think it will open the door to > > its own funders, such as George Soros. I have little doubt that HRW > > will ratify my idea. > > > > YEESSSS. I'm 100% sure soros will love you! Hey Jim shouldn't > > soros be #2 on the murder prediction markets? > > > If Soros (or any other person) refuses, this will reveal information > about him. HRW has already identified the problem. Should he refuse > to assist in a solution? If he does, you can use that refusal to > explain how he's a tool of [fill in the blank]. OK. So I'm looking forward to HRW's answer =) > > > > 1) trump > > 2) soros > > > What deos a libertarian like you have to say about soros Jim? > > > I don't have to like any specific person to get help from him. Fair enough. Maybe he will even donate some dollars to the AP fund... > > Jim Bell > > > >
