On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:42:17 -0500 grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:21 AM, juan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 00:25:25 -0500 > > grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> (for one, pay channels is a > >> total lol given random p2p street commerce), and implemented by > >> compromised. Many youtube videos now present this situation. > > > > > > actually LN is supposed to address that very problem. Small > > casual payments. And it's supposed to route payments using > > onion routing. Now, whether it will actually work > > No x 4. Here's why BTC aka: Bitcoin Core ... > > https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Core so you know shit about the LN and now changed the topic > > ... is compromised, no longer deserves to be one > of the carriers of the "Bitcoin" philosophy banner, > and will ultimately fail... > > https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockstream > https://www.axa.com/en/newsroom/news/axa-strategic-ventures-blockchain > https://www.axastrategicventures.com/asv/blockstream/ > https://blockstream.com/2016/02/02/blockstream-new-investors-55-million-series-a.html > https://wikipedia.org/wiki/AXA > https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/576ac9/bilderberg_group_axa_strategic_ventures_funds/ > https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47zfzt/blockstream_is_now_controlled_by_the_bilderberg/ > you copy pasted the usual stuff about axa while missing even worse 'investors' : conclusion you just copy paste links. here's a link for your list https://blockstream.com/2014/11/17/blockstream-closes-21m-seed-round.html "investors include" "Eric Schmidt’s Innovation Endeavors" - how about that one? looks a lot worse than axa > > > whereas BCH isn't compromised by monopolistic producer of > > ASICs > > All SW (incl coin) runs on untrustable HW, Intel / AMD are such > producers. I didn't say bitmain chips are compromised*. What I'm saying is that bitcoin cash is 'supported' by bitmain because it allows them to use their optimizations. *how can they be - they just do hashes > BCH is relatively less shit than BTC, I don't know. Unlike you I'm not a bch propaganda agent. > which makes it > relatively more viable of the two, not uncompromised. Decentral SW > dev and user indoctrination are still major problems.. > > Cryptocurrency is still early stages, much fun ahead. > > > anyway, it is a fact that the core faction has decided that > > bitcoin is 'digital gold' and should be used as a settlement > > Making it as unusably worthless in everyday life as physical gold is > today. Ok, ok, ok. Now you show your true colors - again. You know exactly fuck about basic economics and history. The one and only reason why physical gold is 'unusable' today is because your fucking government outlawed it and sabotaged its use. > Paper money was the usable. lawl - well I wouldn't expect less ignorant statist garbage from a tor apologist.... > Cryptocurrency covers both > functions and will replace both. cool - that was just the last feature the global cyber police state needed. And the useful idiots gladly provided it. > > > practical unless the 'peers' use servers in NSA > > datacenters... > > All this will be distributed before long. sure, it will because you are praying to the joo god very hard
