On 13/02/2018 06:58, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
As Jordan Peterson points out, that "kill everyone in group X" has
been tried a few times in the 20th C. - and the leftist Marxists were
best at it.
Kill (or expel, or somehow make sure that everyone from group X is just
not around any more) is a very common tactic, and one that is with great
regularity hugely successful.
It gets massively under reported, because it embarrasses the winners.
But if you look at demographics and voting patterns, it is obvious that
there has been a huge amount of it going on, and it works just great for
Forswearing this popular and hugely successful tactic when other groups
do not forswear it is unilateral disarmament.
Other groups will not abandon it unless it looks likely to produce
blowback on them.
Stuff like whites getting expelled from Detroit, Christians from the
middle east, etc is not going to stop unless we start doing similar
operations on blacks and Muslims etc.
In any situation where it is probable that group x is going to do us, we
need to do them first. Then after few massacres and genocides, and
possibly numerous nuclear explosions, then maybe then we can make a more
stable and safe arrangement, but we are not going to get a more stable
and safe arrangement as long as members of group X can get rid of
whites, capitalists, Christians, etc, and never have any fear that that
whites, capitalists, Christians, etc, will return the favor.
No one is motivated to reduce the likelihood of this tactic being used,
as long as one side gets deemed to be good guys when they use it, and
the other side bad guys when they resist it.
Unilaterally forswearing this ever popular and successful tactic does
not mean that there will be less of it, it means there will be more of it.
And the most morally defensible application of this ever popular and
regularly successful approach is to do to commies, what commies always
do to kulaks.