On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400 > grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What are your suggestions as to recourse? > > No point in talking to people who do not listen. LIKE YOU. > > So when you let me know that you actually read and thought > abpit what I wrote to you, I might continue.
I think grarpamp reactively missed your apropos rhetoric "Your recourse against scum like metzger or any other censor is...what...use a FREE channel?" - perhaps since you emboldened the word "FREE" and so he missed that you were NOT doing reverse psychology and simply pointing out the obvious irony that now he's using a free (uncensored) comms channel. Which is in fact the solution, and yes, which grarpamp seems to be missing - The Ministry's programming is so powerful, that even "logical" thinkers like grarpamp miss the obvious (I'm guessing he still wants censorship, does not want the responsibility of being a censor himself, so wants someone else to do the censoring, but wants them to censor in just the way he wants the censoring to be so censored - namely, that he personally does not get censored). Yes, it is hilarious. Grarpamp could start a brissdowner fork, with his royal self the censor to show how censorship should REALLY be done - He only needs a great title to give authority to His Royal Self so the plebes bow low, massa, very low! How about Grarpamp, Royal Hilarion of Sublime Censorship
