Couldn’t we just prune the old spent transactions in the blockchain and keep 
the chain and dB smaller   
  

  
  

  
  
>   
> On Jul 3, 2018 at 6:58 AM,  <juan (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>   
>  On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:50:02 -0700  
> Steven Schear  <[email protected]>  wrote:  
>
> >  I guess for you the article is a TL;DR. There was NOT a suggestion of  
> >  simple confiscation. All one had to do, to prevent "reclamation", is to  
> >  periodically move assets on the blockchain.  
>
>
>  I know. So if you for whatever reason fail to move your funds they are 
> stolen. Doesn't seem like a sensible protocol. Also, moving funds every a 
> fixed period seems like a good way to make tracking easier?  
>
>  Last but not least what do you gain by forcing people to create new UTXOs 
> from existing UTXOs?? Most of the data in the ledger is old spent 
> transactions which are mostly useless*, except they are needed to make sure 
> the supply hasn't been tampered with.  
>
>
> *except for spying that is.  
>
>   
>
>
>              

Reply via email to