Cynicism has it's place.... But it ends at the point you need to make a choice.
It's your choice. Marcos On 7/18/18, juan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:25:22 -0500 > "\\0xDynamite" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> If someone's being wrongly imprisoned (so-called "illegal" "aliens") >> or murdered by the American government, then people need to file >> charges against them. > > you mean, subhumans (that's how your govt sees non US tax cattle) will > chalenge the nazis who are jailing them in the nazis courts? > > > >> >> >> Conspiracy theory: who? the Jewish mafia, the italian mafia, the >> >> Irish mafia? Who? You think they get along enough to coordinate all >> >> of their plots? >> > >> > The mafia I was referring to in my previous message is the criminal >> > organization you call "USA government" - your employers. >> >> Then, just call it "the System" -- it's been known for decades. > > > it's your government, the more succesful and ruthless mafia that has > outcompeted the other mafias. Also, that's the nature of (your) governments > since the beginning of history. > >> >> > Now you can go back to sucking the cock of judge smith while judge >> > jakobo >> > goldberg rapes you in the ass. Have fun 'charging' them. >> >> It is very easy to charge judges, > > > no it is not, and even if you charge them with anything, it is > pointless. > Unless you want to end up in jail or dead. Is that your plan? > > > >> except those of the Supreme Court -- >> get a higher-level executive to charge them. If that's not available, >> get a congressman/woman to charge them. > > I think you would be exterminated as soon as you try to approach any > 'congress'scumbag or 'congress'cunt. Or alternatively you would be able to > send them a fax, so they can use the your fax to wipe their ass. > > > >> A county commissioner can >> charge a lower-level judge with "case fraud", for example and pull the >> lower-level judge into a county court for trial. > > > you mean a 'trial' in 'courts' of mock 'justice' of the people you are > disagreeing with? > > >
