I thought about a way to make an "improvement" on the Jim Bell AP.

I think that this will make it "cheaper", faster and so more effective.

It starts from the part that as there could be more assassins competing for the 
prize.

Some of them can be uncertain that the prize could be too much low for the risk 
of killing the politician.

But at the same time, because of the possible competing killers, everyone of 
them can even be afraid that another assassin could be brave, skilled or just 
lucky to being able to kill the politician for a lower prize.

So this is already a good incentive to push all the killers to try to kill the 
politician for a lower prize.

What I thought is a way to make this incentive even more effective.


"Shared money"

Everyone should be able (if they want) to put their money on more politicians 
"contemporary", even on every politicians on the service or others that they 
can add later.

Those shared money should be pubblic visible to everyone, so even killers 
should be able to see them at any time.

On the possible interface of the service, it should be possible, by clicking on 
a politician, to see how much money on him are shared with other politicians.

So what happen when if one of the politicians that has some shared money on him 
gets killed?

Those shared money will obviously get removed by all the prize of all the other 
selected politicians (chosen before by the users that have put their own money) 
and will go to the winning killer.

With this, I think that all killers will then know that while they are thinking 
about killing "Politician A", if the money on his prize is shared with other 
4/5 politicians, they will be now even worried that another killer will 
terminate one of the other politicians, and so then lowering the prize of their 
selected politician as a possible target.

Users will still be happy because another politician has been killed anyway.

Users will then be able to put even 1$ contemporary on every politician of 
their country (or the entire world), waiting that the first one of them gets 
killed.

Then again, 1$ over all the remaining politicians and so on ...


What do you think about this idea/improvement?

Is it clear enough?

Reply via email to