On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote:
> Adequate anonymity for assassins is a much harder problem. However,
> evidence from .onion marketplaces and child porn forums also suggests
> that Tor would be good enough.
wow - so did you get a bonus from the pentagon? Is that why you started
posting pentagon propandad in this list again?
> If coupled with good OPSEC. At least,
> based on public evidence,
what evidence
> it seems that virtually all busts involved
> serious OPSEC fails.
oh sorry, got it, when you say "evidence' you mean "the pentagon-tor
propaganda I parrot"
> But of course it's possible that public evidence is
> all parallel construction bullshit. And that the NSA nailed them all.
so why do you keep parroting pentagon propaganda if you know how it
works?
> Right, there could be lots of AP lotteries. And so no way to control
> targeting of whatever class of individuals, and of one lottery by
> others. Even so, the wealthy _already_ live in anarchy. In that the
> rules don't apply to them.
that's not what anarchy means.
> States are just their tools.
so they are the #1 statists.
