On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I have explained, above, that even with the use of imaginative accountants,
> the "ultra wealthy" currently fund at least a large majority of (for example)
> America's Federal Government.
That is incorrect. The money that big and hugely corrupt businesses
pay in taxes come from consumers, not the 'rich' themselves. The rich don't pay
taxes, the poor do.
> From:
> https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2015-update/
> ×
> "In contrast, the top 1 percent of all taxpayers (taxpayers with AGIs of
> $428,713 and above), earned 19.04 percent of all AGI in 2013, but paid 37.80
> percent of all federal income taxes. In 2013, the top 1 percent of taxpayers
> accounted for more income taxes paid than the bottom 90 percent combined.Nov
> 19, 2015[end of quote]
>
> For now, let's just consider that "top 1 percent of all taxpayers" who "paid
> 37.80% of all Federal income taxes.
That same 1% got all sorts of benefits from the govt, starting with the
fact that the government is the enabler of the corporatist system that made
them 'wealthy' thieves.
> Do you think THEY believe that those taxes are being spent wisely? No,
>they're not stupid, are they? They know that money is being wasted.
Indeed they are not stupid. They know that they owe 'their' wealth to
the govt, so the last thing they want to do is go against their vital partner
in crime.
All that said (again), if AP has a chance then the funding will have to
come from honest people, not from the ultra rich, ultra corrupt and ultra
criminal oligarchy that rules the planet.
> Except that he doesn't have a billion times more targets. He doesn't know
> who to target, and will likely never learn, because AP is intended to be
> anonymous. AP can be readily used to tear down governments and their
> oppression. It cannot be easily used to oppress, if for no other reason that
> people who want to oppress don't know who to target.
Yes, that makes sense, so it seems plausible that the statists won't
use the AP system. Also, they may not want to use it because it is 'ilegal'.
Although the government certainly do 'ilegal'(by their own standards) stuff, in
this case, usign the AP system would be tantamout to admiting that they can't
provide security even for themselves, so using it would be very bad publicity
to say the least.
What the statists will do is attack the AP system using ordinary means
like finding out who the users are, and killing them. While the ultra rich
cheer.
>
>
> Jim Bell
