Doh! Link to audio interview with Tommy Robinson: https://sputniknews.com/radio/201810121068837137-jon-gaunt-tommy-robinson-exclusive/
Bonus - they even did a transcript: https://sputniknews.com/interviews/201810121068834490-tommy-robinson-britain/ On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 09:37:19PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Tommy Robinson lays out his treatment at the hands of the UK > "justice" system, their courts and "law" (abominable legal process) > and that he's been offered that he will not go to jail again, on his > (illegal, without precedent) retrial, if he will just plead guilty. > > Tommy Robinson: “I said to my wife, "I cannot do it, no matter what!"” > > > Well done Tommy - you're setting a Haverbeck-tier example. > > Just like not signing an "unconditional" bail and doing 7 months "at > her majesty's pleasure" for the privilege of standing for the right > of free and unfettered passage. > > > Nice to see a few goy starting to stand. > > > > Here's the thing though, and let's take the German Haverbeck example > rather than the UK or Aussie example: > > 1) > So (((they))) brought in a despotic law, in the German case, making a > criminal offence out of even the mere questioning of the "Holocaust" > (truly, the Holohoax). > > 2) > Grandma Haverbeck lives her right, the right to put forward/ publish > the facts she has access to, along with her right to publicly ask a > few, rather difficult, questions, for a random example "gas death > chambers" with rickety wooden paling fence gates rather than sealed > steel doors. > > 3) > On the second instance, Haverbeck is slammed in the clink. > > And the point is this: > > - Imagine a few dozen people all publicly stating that they > genuinely have the same Haverbeck question. > > - They do this publicly, ensuring media coverage and very public > unanimous voices. > > A few dozen is no longer a lone, unsupported, "conspiracy theorist" > or whatever ad-hom term is used in the German law, perhaps > "offender". > > A few dozen is heard around the world. > > A few dozen, treated to such a "legal" spectacle inspires 100s if not > 1000s of fellow goy to add their voices to the front runners. > > > NOW the evil law may well be overturned, for example with a wave of > the magical declaration wand of the high court "This law is no longer > enforceable." > > > Surely discarding the cloak of fear has to be one of the greatest > "internal shackles" liberations possible before passing from this > world, no matter "win", "lose" or draw? >
