On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:55:57 -0500
bbrewer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does anyone else want to see the “30 pages of sprawl” version? Any leads?
I certainly do. I've been wondering if some bits in the coindesk piece
are outright fake.
"He/she/they debated aspects of how a digital currency might work..."
"She/he/it even acknowledged this...'
using PC bullshit "she" for satoshi doesn't sound like Tim May.
>
> Context is key in so much; Their original put into context, isn’t near 30
> pages. Figure of speech?
>
> No? What was omitted? How was this framed? Etc, Etc
yep
