On 07/14/2019 05:04 PM, Punk wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 16:13:26 -0700 > Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> You are such an jerk. >> >> Why would you speculate about someone "guessing" your password, or Vince >> "playing games", after John clearly said that he spoofed some header? > > because spoofing headers DOESNT actually WORK!! Doesn't "work" in the > sense of creating a message that looks authentic. > > if you look at the headers of message 075590, which I didn't write, the > headers look authentic : > > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2019-July/075590.html
OK, I get it. Sorry to be such a jerk. I hadn't read the earlier posts about spoofed messages from your CockMail account. And I thought that you were referring to John's message that you replied to, not this other message, "Boomerhedge - Boomer Propaganda Cesspool". But seriously, that one is even less well spoofed. | From: Punk <[email protected]> vs the message I'm replying to now | From: Punk <[email protected]> > John tried doing the same thing and failed because a random cock.li > user can't spoof a header in a way that makes it look *authentic*. SO, if the > header IS authentic or a 'perfect fake', then there are a few options > > 1) somebody has my password > > 2) or cock.li's admin himself sent the messages (both 1 and 2 as > suggested by Shawn) > > 3) or I'm lying and no message was spoofed. So I first wrote a message > saying that zerohedge is garbage and then I wrote a reply to my own message > as if I were a different person, disgagreeing with myself. Because I'm that > retarded. > > needless to say I KNOW option 3 is false, but you're free to believe in > such 'conspiracy theory'. Unless I missed something, I doubt that your account has been compromised. Or that Vince is fucking with you. >> You can bullshit all you want, but it was a dumb thing to say, and it >> makes you look like an idiot. And it makes me wonder whether he actually >> got it right, because I don't recall you being as idiotic as this ;) > > > So what about YOU misreading what I said? You're clearly > misunderstanding something. I'm even willing to admit it's because of my less > than perfect english...But hopefully NOW you got it. Yes, I got it. Sorry. Just crabby today, I guess.
