HI Ryan (*_*) -------- Original Message -------- On Jul 25, 2019, 3:30 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> Woman commits numerous crimes, and certainly numerous acts which are an > offense against society. > Woman is later threatened with perjury, takes immunity, names a man, makes > slanderous allegations against him, and is exonerated (???). > US government investigators later go on to decide the best action, is to > mount an investigation against that single man, devote millions of dollars of > resources just to monitor him. Most evident motivation is to put pressure > against the guy so that he may crack and do ... (???) to accomplish (???). > Unclear if man is framed or somehow condoned the allegations against himself, > although the latter is totally illogical? > Years pass, the investigation continues, they continue efforts, and insinuate > the allegations against him (when they are self-evidently false). They also > begin “flexing”, showing off that law enforcement interfaces have non-public > features to (???) to accomplish (???). > > Government admits to nothing. Situation reaches extreme ludicrousness. > Somehow the investigation into this one man, that has accomplished nothing, > that is unlikely to yield anything, who never met the woman in question, is > prioritized over everything else, for no other reason than this is the only > possible investigation that they could devote so much resources to over so > long to dedicate to one person. > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
