On Sunday, September 8, 2019, 01:48:17 PM PDT, jim bell
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 1:39 PM, Punk<[email protected]> wrote:On Sun, 8 Sep 2019
18:35:34 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe I've solved that problem.
Did you make any experiments, have any real proof for your claim or is it
just theoretical speculation?
>So far theoretical speculation only. Backed by granted patents.
I should mention that I am not implying that a granted patent is somehow a
guarantee an invention is "new, useful, and unobvious of one skilled in the
subject of the invention", the general three requirements for patentability.
If a patented invention does not "work", then it isn't "useful", and the patent
can be challenged on that basis. But if it doesn't work, it becomes
functionally irrelevant anyway. The US Patent Office doesn't have the time to
verify that inventions 'work'.
In order to evaluate this as a proposed idea, a physicist would consider:
1. The loss of manufactured optical waveguides did indeed hit an unexplained
'floor' in the early 1980s, about 0.16 db/kilometers of loss.2. The
manufacturers and users of such fibers have had a very powerful motivation to
figure out how to lower their loss to well below 0.16 db/kilometers, for nearly
40 years.3. Nothing has yet been found, or it would have been employed.4.
Photons do indeed possess an oscillating magnetic field.5. A nucleus of an
isotope with 'spin' does indeed behave as magnetic dipole.6. Such a nucleus
should be mechanically affected by the passage of light.7. Energy should be
transferred from that light to the nucleus, and thus the atom, as the light
passes.8. Removing most or all atoms with an electromagnetic 'spin' should
remove this loss mechanism, in proportion to the amount of such isotopes
remaining.
Do you have any other ideas as to how that loss is manifested?
