On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:44:58PM -0300, Punk - Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:06:09 +0100 > Steven Schear <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Isn't that why networks like i2p exist? > > yes, I was about to mention that i2p does have some of the > characteristics that a tor replacement should have. Like > > 1) all users are also routers. > 2) it's not funded by the pentagon. > 3) there are no central 'directory authorities' - it's a p2p network. > > https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor > > looks like i2p COULD do traffic padding, but it's not doing it. > > "Other potential benefits of I2P but not yet implemented" > "create a tunnel that will handle 500 messages / minute, where the > endpoint will inject dummy messages if there are insufficient messages" > > for what it's worth, I tried i2p in the past a few times and abandoned > it after a few days because I didn't find any interesting content in the > network. My assumption was that if there was no 'illegal' content, then the > system must have some (serious) flaw. On second thought I realize that's not > necessarily the case at all.
It seems you can configure tor browser to route over i2p: https://www.reddit.com/r/i2p/comments/di6efs/configure_tor_browser_90a7_to_work_with_i2pd/ Freenet is another like-minded project. In addition to routing, it can host content: https://freenetproject.org/pages/documentation.html
