I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already been
re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could constitute
"interfering with a criminal investigation". But your imagination may differ.
Jim Bell
On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 12:47:26 PM PST, Razer <[email protected]>
wrote:
This is your answer and China will stomp you if you INTERFERE WITH A CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION too. So will any court system on earth.
Get psychiatric help.
"Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblower’s name and
will revisit this decision if the name is widely published in the media or used
by public figures in debate."
On November 9, 2019 10:44:33 AM PST, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
https://apnews.com/ad8f2a9b6e424138afcc97fcf2eb29bf
I wonder what they mean by "deleting the name"? Do they mean deleting any
posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'? Or just that name?
Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower"?
This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China, "The
Great Firewall of China".
I've got a solution to that problem: The people who work for Facebook are
identifiable, and mortal.
Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews". How appropriate.
Jim Bell
Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice
