On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 04:21:02AM +0000, jim bell wrote: > On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 08:06:38 PM PST, Razer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already > >been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could > >constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation". But your > >imagination may differ. > > Jim Bell > > > > > You can do whatever you like until they tell you to stop. > > Sounds like you are abandoning your foolish idea that after thousands of > other people have named Eric Ciaramella, it is somehow wrong to do so, > > Then you can't, > So far, nobody has told me, or thousands of other people, to stop mentioning > Eric Ciaramella's name. Nor are they likely to do thatThe law which > "protects" "whistleblowers" likely doesn't even cover this guy, who didn't > actually see anything; he was simply TOLD it, and the accuracy of that > telling is highly suspect. And, to boot, he isn't a lawyer, and is highly > unlikely to have been able to interpret what he was told as being "legal" or > "illegal", > >and I'm sure there's some legal facility for making sure leaked information > gets reeled in as much as possible to avoid bungling up the investigation. > I don't think it's even "leaked". It was PUBLICIZED by some in the news > media, after having been GIVEN the name by government employees. It is > called NEWS. These things happen. I seem to recall seeing that Shifty > Schiff actually accidently spoke the name. The cat, then, was out of the bag.
LOL - why the fuck do you re-use Trump's idiotic nick names for his political rivals? Wouldn't the POTUS be at the top of your AP list? > >There's a bunch of federal codes I'm not up on, but the above is the bottom > >line and that line only rises higher towards you neck, and a garrotting, if > >it involves national security. > I guess that's the closest we can get you to admit that you are full of shit. > This case had little to do with "national security". > > > >Disclaimer: I am not a Lawyer. DO NOT call me in the middle of the night for > >bail money. > After 10,000+ hours in a Federal prison law library, learning all sorts of > Federal law, I'm as close to being a lawyer as you will likely see, absent a > bar-card. > Jim Bell > > > > > > > > > > > >On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 12:47:26 PM PST, Razer <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >This is your answer and China will stomp you if you INTERFERE WITH A > >CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION too. So will any court system on earth. > > > >Get psychiatric help. > > > >"Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblower’s > >name and will revisit this decision if the name is widely published in > >the media or used by public figures in debate." > > > >On November 9, 2019 10:44:33 AM PST, jim bell <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower > > > >I wonder what they mean by "deleting the name"? Do they mean deleting > >any posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'? Or just > >that name? Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the > >whistleblower"? > >This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China, > >"The Great Firewall of China". > >I've got a solution to that problem: The people who work for Facebook > >are identifiable, and mortal. > > > >Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews". How > >appropriate. > > Jim Bell > > > > > > > > > Rr > Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail > > | > | > | > | | | > > | > > | > | > | | > Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower > > Facebook says it is deleting the name of the person who has been identified > in conservative circles as the whist... > | > > | > > | > > > > -- GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4 C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
