> Minute 2: > profit from transactions: 50 > 50<70 profit not enough to pay public services. > taxes: 20 (takes 4 from each account) (this a simplification for > illustrating, the real algorithm takes from each account proportional to the > balance)
You might have difficulty encouraging people to accept this step. Let's call this just a very, very mild hunch :) > My argumentation goes as my thoughts are for using cryptoeconomy to solve a > public system that could compete with traditional governments. It will be the > choice of the people to choose the better system. Is it possible that people's choices might not be as magnanimous (or "enlightened") as you think?
