On 1/9/20 4:56 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>>  These "acknowledgements" sent to me are rather useless, and indeed quite
>> insulting, if they don't actually confirm that the server that runs the list
>> will actually POST my message, rather than merely say it "was successfully
>> received by the cypherpunks mailing list."
>> Because TWICE I recieved such a "acknowledgement" and yet the message didn't
>> post.
> Here's something even more alarming:  I don't get "acknowledgement
> messages" at all, yet my messages show up in my feeds from the server.
>
> I seen strange, inconsistent behavior on the hackerspaces mailing list
> as well.  It's like they black-ball or moderate messages only from
> certain senders -- and do it invisibly so no one knows such activity
> is happening.
>
> It's called black-balling.  Who knows if you're a woman and get this 
> treatment?
>
> marc0s


Go to the list page and log in. There's a switch to turn the acks on or
off. Personally they're redundant for me as I get copies of the emails I
send to the list from the list server so I never use the function.

Rr


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to