‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, February 2, 2020 4:27 AM, Ryan Carboni <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/officials-boston-suspect-had-no-firearm-when-barrage-of-bullets-hit-hiding-place/2013/04/24/376fc8a0-ad18-11e2-a8b9-2a63d75b5459_story.html
> Although police feared he was heavily armed, the suspect in the Boston
> Marathon bombing had no firearms...


this was an early instance of assassination as NatSec policy. you'll remember 
this is before the drone strikes on americans over seas (read: unlawful).

they also assassinated a cleric in boston; released dogs on him while he was 
unarmed, which gave excuse to gun him down (they killed one of their own police 
dogs taking him out.)

these documents are still restricted from the public.

see 
https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/orchestratedexitevilforevil-25973/

welcome to amerikkka!


best regards,

Reply via email to