So no one need to look and see what "cypherpunks Digest, Vol 81, Issue 14 (was :> ... about.
On 3/6/20 4:48 PM, Philipp Angele wrote: > True. "Pure" randomness will always be preferred to provide a maximum > security. > If you need a key that you feel could keep your data encrypted for 50 > years, geokeys would not be a good choice. > However if it is short term use like with bitcoin you can do a trade > of between level of key security and risk of losing the key. > You would not have to make sure the encryption lasts for 50 years but > only as long as you want to keep this key. > >> Am 06.03.2020 um 14:17 schrieb [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>: >> >> >> Even though it would be hard to guess a secret key, this technique >> reduces the security provided by a secret key made of pure random bits. >> true? >> >>> Please try the POC and share your >>> thoughts: https://github.com/oscar-davids/geokeytool >>> >>> Geokeys for Bitcoin and Ether and other killer apps like pgp, ssh >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
