It's a sad world:
Neo-Nazi White Knights Go All in on Defending the Honor of Women Who had Sex
with Harvey Weinstein
http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/neo-nazi-white-knights-go-all-in-on-defending-the-honor-of-women-who-had-sex-with-harvey-weinstein/
[you just KNOW you don't want to see that alabaster thigh with the rose
tattoo]
Fortunately, TDS is here to set the teenyboppers straight!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:01:35PM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
> The Daily Stormer is now the world's #1 Harvey Weinstein supporter, calling
> for the ex Hollywood mogul to be freed.
>
> “A New Day” – Following Weinstein Lynching, Jew Lawyers Hail Coming Mass
> Rape Hoax Movement
>
> http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/a-new-day-following-weinstein-lynching-jew-lawyers-hail-coming-mass-rape-hoax-movement/
> Andrew Anglin
> Daily Stormer
> February 26, 2020
>
> #HarveyWeinsteinDidNothingWrong #FreeHarvey
>
> As I said on Tuesday, following the conviction of Harvey Weinstein for
> various rape hoaxes, heterosexual sex is now effectively illegal in America
> (if you’re a man). The message that has been sent to women is that they can
> now have any man they’ve ever had sex with in prison on a whim.
>
> Jew lawyers are celebrating the fact that the Weinstein conviction has
> redefined rape, redefined consent, redefined evidence and opens up an entire
> new world of rape hoaxing, as they prepare to bring the hammer down on the
> goyim.
>
>
> https://www.timesofisrael.com/weinstein-case-could-influence-other-sex-crime-prosecutions/
> :
>
> New York prosecutors are hailing Harvey Weinstein’s conviction as a
> pivotal moment that could change the way the legal system views a type of
> sexual assault case historically considered difficult to prove.
>
> Most of the women who testified against Weinstein stayed in contact
> with him — and sometimes had consensual sexual encounters with him — after
> alleged attacks. None promptly reported his crimes. There was little physical
> evidence to bolster their stories.
>
> The jury convicted anyway, finding the producer guilty of raping one
> woman in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006.
>
> “This is a new day,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said
> after the verdict was announced. “Rape is rape whether the survivor reports
> within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the
> complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if
> there is no physical evidence.”
>
> That is to say: it’s rape if she says it’s rape.
>
> And she can say it is rape for any reason.
>
> That is now the law.
>
> While the law recognizes that people can be assaulted by intimate
> partners in ongoing relationships, those cases have rarely been prosecuted in
> the past, because they’re difficult to prove, several trial lawyers said. The
> tide is starting to change, however, as prosecutors take more risks and
> juries become more aware of the complexities of human behavior.
>
> Now, they no longer have to be proven.
>
> Because “believe women.”
>
> “This case challenges our notions of what is force in a sexual
> relationship, what is lack of consent in a sexual relationship,” said Paul
> DerOhannesian, an Albany, New York, defense lawyer, former sex crimes
> prosecutor and author of a guide to sexual assault trials. He followed the
> trial coverage and found it telling that one of the first questions from the
> jury involved the legal definition of “consent” and “forcible compulsion.”
>
> …
>
> One of the first witnesses at trial was an expert on victim behavior,
> who testified that it isn’t unusual for sexual assault victims to continue
> communicating with their attackers. A decade ago, that type of expert
> testimony was rarely allowed.
>
> …
>
> Criminal defense attorney Richard Kaplan said the New York case could
> both empower women to come forward and embolden prosecutors to take on tough
> cases.
>
> “Now there is a roadmap on how you can win this kind of case,” he said,
> predicting more people would come forward.
>
> “There’s always the fear of coming forward, you know, going through a
> trial, getting beat up and humiliated and then not getting that verdict. Now
> that they see it can be done, I think more people will come forward and
> definitely empower the movement.”
>
> These Jews are just openly saying: “now we’re just going to start
> prosecuting you all – the floodgates are open, and it’s a free-for-all at
> this point.”
>
> Lawyer Carrie Goldberg represents Weinstein accuser Lucia Evans, whose
> complaint against him was initially part of the indictment, but Vance’s
> office ultimately dropped her allegations from the case. While Goldberg
> faults Vance for not sticking with her client, she said the conviction is a
> “watershed moment” — and a long time coming.
>
> “I hope that prosecutors, all over this country, and all over the
> world, look at this case and realize that rape trials can be won,” Goldberg
> said, “and that these aren’t just ‘he said, she said’ stories, but they’re
> actually crimes that are winnable and need to be brought.”
>
> So that’s where we are now.
>
> This is not me saying that all of the dynamics of rape-hoaxing have
> change – it is an army of Jew lawyers saying that the dynamics have changed,
> and that they’re going to do everything in their power to bring a whole new
> wave of these cases.
>
> There is going to be an entire new industry formed around it. They are
> going to set up charities to pay for the lawsuits of rape hoaxers. All of
> these Jew lawyers are going to take the cases for free. Women are going to be
> encouraged by organizations, the state, their therapists and church clergy to
> press charges and have men thrown in prison.
>
> In my expert advice, you should seriously consider not ever having sex in
> America ever again.
>
> We need to organize a strike.
>
> We men need to get together and simply say that we refuse to participate
> in this charade. We are human beings.
>
>
>
>
> Woman Hoaxes Rape After Her Boyfriend Finds Out About Affair
>
> http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/woman-hoaxes-rape-after-her-boyfriend-finds-out-about-affair/
>
> This is an outrage.
>
> You’re supposed to believe women.
>
> But we’re told this woman was lying, so we shouldn’t believe her?
>
> I only ever heard “believe women.” I never heard “check to see if what
> she is saying is true or not.”
>
> The fact that a woman is lying DOES NOT mean that we shouldn’t believe
> her.
>
> Navy Times:
>
>
> https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2020/02/25/woman-pleads-guilty-to-lying-to-ncis-about-rape/
> A Virginia woman who accused a sailor of raping her has now admitted
> the rape never occurred, according to a recent court filing and a U.S.
> Department of Justice statement. She accused him of the crime in case her
> “significant other” found out about their affair.
> ...
