On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:48:49PM +1000, [email protected] wrote: > On 2020-03-15 11:58, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > So is it fair to assume then that you agree with all the resignations > > (RMS), knee-bending (Torvalds), and turmoil (openSUSE and many others)? > > > > It is of course your right to agree with such treatment of various > > founders, as we have witnessed a fair bit of in recent times. Good lessons > > for future founders (to enshrine their "broflake" power CoCs before the > > snowflakes have a chance to usurp power and damage the founders). > > > > Long term, I believe this is a functional parting of the ways between > > humans with different preferred ways of being in this world. > > > > The CoC for those of robust temperament, is a different CoC to those of > > snowflake temperament. > > Empiricaly, we observe that projects with a CoC suffer bitrot, which bitrot is > likely to prove fatal in the long run. > > Need a CoC that is hostile to snowflakes, and outright bans social justice > warriors in total.
"Intuitively" this feels correct to me, but I don't know that anyone's put the IQ cycles into tabulation and summary yet .. though I await to be pleasantly surprised :)
