Remember: the entire debt based usury money system we slave under, is
exponential in nature, and every "intervention" (e.g. Q.E.), on average shall
(must, mathematically) be exponentially larger than the previous "intervention".
And so is it, it is so ... literally half a trillion dollars of IMF/BIS/Fed
bailout over the last six months ("repo crisis liquidity injection"), is not
quite enough, and so "due to COVID-19", the next bailout is ... literally a
trillion dollars (close to a doubling):
23 September 2019 - ~$400 billion+ :
Why the Repo Market Is Such a Big Deal—and Why Its $400 Billion Bailout Is
So Unnerving
https://fortune.com/2019/09/23/repo-market-big-deal-400-billion-bailout-unnerving/
.. A $1 trillion market springs a leak
.. We estimate that over the first year, the Fed would need to buy
roughly $400bn of Treasury securities to achieve an appropriate level of
reserves, plus a buffer,” the Bank of America wrote in a research note.
...
[
Whoopsie, did we say $400 billion over 1 year? What we really meant was 6
months, then we shall reassess.
. . .
Oh shirt! Oh dear me! Yes yes, it's been 6 months, we've pumped the
firetruck outta the money printing press and whaddaya know? - we gotta double
down, this time a trillion dollars, and fer surely we'll be lucky to make even
THAT stretch to 6 months:
]
16 March 2020 - ~ $900 billion+ :
IMF Prepares $1 Trillion [officially $900 billion] Bazooka
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/imf-prepares-1-trillion-bazooka
.. In a blog post published minutes ago, IMF Director Kristalina
Georgieva .. declaring that the IMF has $1 trillion in loan capacity ready to
put to work to salve the economic damage caused by the outbreak
.. "The IMF stands ready to mobilize its $1 trillion lending capacity to
help our membership. As a first line of defense, the Fund can deploy its
flexible and rapid-disbursing emergency response toolkit to help countries with
urgent balance-of-payment needs."
...
Who could pothibly have predicted thith?
Feel free to enjoy the gluttonous superiority trip from smarmily expounding
such deep mathematical truths to the ignorant laity sheeple pleble.
Or actually, perhaps try practicing a little humility instead.
We're gettin' close, muffas . . .
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:30:51AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> There are a few bell weathers starting to make the rounds, here's one:
>
> "X suffers Biggest Loss in History!"
>
> In this case, the X in the headline is "ALL risk parity funds" where risk
> parity funds are a type of hedge funds which apparently arbitrage stocks and
> aginst bonds.
>
> Risk Parity Funds Just Suffered The Biggest Loss In History
>
> https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/risk-parity-funds-just-suffered-biggest-loss-history
>
>
> When your fud-durr-durr-mentals are brokensaw - 'member the Fed' - your
> houses of cards built on those fundamentals will at some point come crashing
> down.
>
> You see there's a funny little thing with usury - the mathematical
> fundamental of this very Jewish banking system is exponential - forever
> growth or infinite growth (unlimited "economic expansion").
>
> Now fictitious "assets" can in fact grow in unlimited numerical terms, but
> when "the real economy" is tied to fictious exponentially growing "financial
> assets", then there is a basic imbalance which must, inevitably, appear - one
> could say this is the ultimate arbitrage, between exponential maths and
> reality.
>
> One consequence of this rollercoaster of financial death is that every
> mechanism designed on this exponential (thus broken) system, must itself be
> in essence, an exponentially growing system - so hedge funds must grow
> exponentially, every tool of financialization will, eventually, demonstrate
> exponential growth (such as stock buy backs etc), and the real economy needs
> to also grow exponentially to prop all the financialization up - and this is
> in fact achieved with things like real estate and business price growth.
>
> (Those who are somewhat familiar with real estate from a lowly "investor"
> perspective, will be aware that there are expanding ripples of price
> inflation over time, which hit different geographic regions at different
> times (different years, sometimes different decades) - and once the
> "investor" crowd hits a new geographic area which was once relatively dormant
> (Australia's a big country ok), then the key growth metric is the time period
> for (real estate) price doubling - which is usually around the 6 to 8 years
> mark.)
>
> So, real estate doubling in price every X years? Yes, that's exponential
> "asset valuation increases" and real estate is a fundamental of "the real
> economy" which supports the house of fictious cards above it.
>
> But this exponential is gonna bite, because to support exponentially rising
> real estate prices, you need exponentially rising incomes to pay the interest
> rates.
>
> So one signal of the imbalances of all this coming to the fore is usurious
> interest rates plummeting. Is this a good thing? No, because a) this
> demonstrates we are in a fundamentally messed up money system, b) real estate
> prices are way out of whack with real (average person) incomes, c) real
> estate price inflation has itself caused a bunch of system imbalances, wealth
> divide etc., and surely other reasons still.
>
>
> Now, the summary and line punch:
>
> 0) our present money system is, mathematically, exponential; for the time
> being we are bound by this, and we see some of the effects of this quite
> starkly today
>
> 1) every aspect of our system must therefore also be exponential (in growth
> or decline); e.g. every "emergency intervention system" (such as QE) must
> also be eponential, that is, each QE (on average) must grow exponentially
> with respect to the previous intervention (corporate share buybacks are a
> pooman's (poor CEO's) intervention mechanism)
>
> 2) eventually the Fed's QE intervention must be larger than the entire
> market; in other words, at some point, if the goal is to sustain the system's
> existence, the Fed shall be mathematically bound, literally, to buy every
> asset everywhere, or the system will literally collapse if they fail to do so
> - i.e. to buy every bond (gov and corp), every business, every stock/share,
> every real estate title
>
>
> This is of course the basic mechanism of an exponential debt based system,
> and one can fairly say this is in fact the intention of this system - Atlas
> Shrugged - no matter who you are, how ethical, how successful, how well
> intentioned, how contributory to society at large, except that you are the
> owner of the system (i.e. the BIS - 'member the Fed), then you are Atlas, and
> you are targetted, and eventually, in order to merely survive financially,
> you will have to sell to the Fed/BIS.
>
> This is the nature, and intention, of "the Federal Reserve Banking system:
> your gibs, are mine!"
>
>
>
> Exponential Growth and the Legend of Paal Paysam
> http://www.singularitysymposium.com/exponential-growth.html
> The rice and the chessboard story – The power of exponential growth
> https://purposefocuscommitment.com/the-rice-and-the-chess-board-story/
>
> There was once a king in India who was a big chess enthusiast and had the
> habit of challenging wise visitors to a game of chess. One day a traveling
> sage was challenged by the king. The sage having played this game all his
> life all the time with people all over the world gladly accepted the Kings
> challenge. To motivate his opponent the king offered any reward that the sage
> could name. The sage modestly asked just for a few grains of rice in the
> following manner: the king was to put a single grain of rice on the first
> chess square and double it on every consequent one. The king accepted the
> sage’s request.
>
> Having lost the game and being a man of his word the king ordered a bag
> of rice to be brought to the chessboard. Then he started placing rice grains
> according to the arrangement: 1 grain on the first square, 2 on the second, 4
> on the third, 8 on the fourth and so on.
>
> Following the exponential growth of the rice payment, the king quickly
> realized that he was unable to fulfill his promise because on the twentieth
> square the king would have had to put 1,000,000 grains of rice. On the
> fortieth square, the king would have had to put 1,000,000,000 grains of rice.
> And, finally, on the sixty-fourth square, the king would have had to put more
> than 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 grains of rice which is equal to about 210
> billion tons and is allegedly sufficient to cover the whole territory of
> India with a meter thick layer of rice.
>
> It was at that point that the sage told the king that he doesn’t have to
> pay the debt immediately but can do so over time. And so the sage became the
> wealthiest person in the world.
