On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:31:55AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On 3/20/20, John Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > NIST Provides Comprehensive Resources for Secure Teleworking > > > > https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/itl-bulletin/2020/03/security-for-enterprise-telework-remote-access-and-byod/final > > > > https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-46r2.pdf > > Don't forget... every supposed "end-to-end secure crypto" thingy that > pushes pulls terminates stores into from or on an endpoint you don't > control... is not secure, and often plundered in various manners by
s/often// TFTFY > those with your best disinterests in mind. This generally includes all > closed source commercial software. Wannabee Crypto AG's, NSA's, > and backdoor corporate datapimps everywhere. > > > " > > What are the best-in-class video conferencing options for low-bandwidth > > situations? > > Lines flapping or dropping packets is classic > problem for streaming / interactive comms, > downgrade is to use file xfer tools. > > Beware commercial services regarding cryptoprivacy. > There are lot of tools for creating crypto private lans, > anon nets, over IP to add that layer to standalone > opensource apps where needed. > > If just low bandwidth, try testing point-to-point on lowest > rate/quality codec option settings first, don't need 4K HDR > just to talk and hold newspaper pages in front of camera. > If at least one peer can handle being a hub, or threat model > allows to rent some cheap shell host, then conference options > open up. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_instant_messaging_protocols > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cross-platform_instant_messaging_clients > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_VoIP_software > > Tox, Jami, Matrix, Signal, Jitsi, Wire > FreeSWITCH, Jingle Protocol > > Some people play with those, there are many tools, > see what fits, have fun. > " > > https://github.com/Loki-project > > More out there you can find...
