https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/03/google-is-now-publishing-coronavirus-mobility-reports-feeding-off-users-location-history/


Google  is giving the world a clearer glimpse of exactly how much it knows 
about people everywhere — using the coronavirus crisis as an opportunity to 
repackage its persistent tracking of where users go and what they do as a 
public good in the midst of a pandemic.

In a blog post today, the tech giant announced the publication of what it’s 
branding COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports, an in-house analysis of the much 
more granular location data it maps and tracks to fuel its ad-targeting, 
product development and wider commercial strategy to showcase aggregated 
changes in population movements around the world.

The coronavirus pandemic has generated a worldwide scramble for tools and data 
to inform government responses. In the EU, for example, the European Commission 
has been leaning on telcos to hand over anonymized and aggregated location data 
to model the spread of COVID-19.

Google’s data dump looks intended to dangle a similar idea of public policy 
utility while providing an eyeball-grabbing public snapshot of mobility shifts 
via data pulled off of its global user-base.

In terms of actual utility for policymakers, Google’s suggestions are pretty 
vague. The reports could help government and public health officials 
“understand changes in essential trips that can shape recommendations on 
business hours or inform delivery service offerings,” it writes.

“Similarly, persistent visits to transportation hubs might indicate the need to 
add additional buses or trains in order to allow people who need to travel room 
to spread out for social distancing,” it goes on. “Ultimately, understanding 
not only whether people are traveling, but also trends in destinations, can 
help officials design guidance to protect public health and essential needs of 
communities.”

The location data Google is making public is similarly fuzzy — to avoid 
inviting a privacy storm — with the company writing it’s using “the same 
world-class anonymization technology that we use in our products every day,” as 
it puts it.






On Monday, March 23, 2020, 12:35:41 AM PDT, jim bell <[email protected]> 
wrote: 



https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/18/israel-passes-emergency-law-to-use-mobile-data-for-covid-19-contact-tracing/

Israel passes emergency law to use mobile data for COVID-19 contact tracing
Natasha Lomas@riptari / 3:25 am PDT • March 18, 2020

Israel has passed an emergency law to use mobile phone data for tracking people 
infected with COVID-19 including to identify and quarantine others they have 
come into contact with and may have infected.
The BBC reports that the emergency law was passed during an overnight sitting 
of the cabinet, bypassing parliamentary approval.
Israel also said it will step up testing substantially as part of its respond 
to the pandemic crisis.

In a statement posted to Facebook, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote: “We 
will dramatically increase the ability to locate and quarantine those who have 
been infected. Today, we started using digital technology to locate people who 
have been in contact with those stricken by the Corona. We will inform these 
people that they must go into quarantine for 14 days. These are expected to be 
large – even very large – numbers and we will announce this in the coming days. 
Going into quarantine will not be a recommendation but a requirement and we 
will enforce it without compromise. This is a critical step in slowing the 
spread of the epidemic.”



=================================================
   
The Prime Minister of Israel
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the following remarks this evening, at 
the joint statements with Health M...   


On Sunday, March 15, 2020, 11:46:22 PM PDT, jim bell <[email protected]> 
wrote: 


https://apnews.com/97dbcb6d4ef71a48d15a7ec5dd7b4c48

[partial quote follows]

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel has long been known for its use of technology to track 
the movements of Palestinian militants. Now, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 
wants to use similar technology to stop the movement of the coronavirus.
Netanyahu’s Cabinet on Sunday authorized the Shin Bet security agency to use 
its phone-snooping tactics on coronavirus patients, an official confirmed, 
despite concerns from civil-liberties advocates that the practice would raise 
serious privacy issues. The official spoke on condition of anonymity pending an 
official announcement.
Netanyahu announced his plan in a televised address late Saturday, telling the 
nation that the drastic steps would protect the public’s health, though it 
would also “entail a certain degree of violation of privacy.”

Israel has identified more than 200 cases of the coronavirus. Based on 
interviews with these patients about their movements, health officials have put 
out public advisories ordering tens of thousands of people who may have come 
into contact with them into protective home quarantine.
The new plan would use mobile-phone tracking technology to give a far more 
precise history of an infected person’s movements before they were diagnosed 
and identify people who might have been exposed.
In his address, Netanyahu acknowledged the technology had never been used on 
civilians. But he said the unprecedented health threat posed by the virus 
justified its use. For most people, the coronavirus causes only mild or 
moderate symptoms. But for some, especially older adults and people with 
existing health problems, it can cause more severe illness.
“They are not minor measures. They entail a certain degree of violation of the 
privacy of those same people, who we will check to see whom they came into 
contact with while sick and what preceded that. This is an effective tool for 
locating the virus,” Netanyahu said.
The proposal sparked a heated debate over the use of sensitive security 
technology, who would have access to the information and what exactly would be 
done with it.
Nitzan Horowitz, leader of the liberal opposition party Meretz, said that 
tracking citizens “using databases and sophisticated technological means are 
liable to result in a severe violation of privacy and basic civil liberties.” 
He said any use of the technology must be supervised, with “clear rules” for 
the use of the information.
Netanyahu led a series of discussions Sunday with security and health officials 
to discuss the matter. Responding to privacy concerns, he said late Sunday he 
had ordered a number of changes in the plan, including reducing the scope of 
data that would be gathered and limiting the number of people who could see the 
information, to protect against misuse.
[end of partial quote]


=========================================


On Friday, February 21, 2020, 04:45:16 PM PST, jim bell <[email protected]> 
wrote: 

I am surprised that when I do a Google search for 'COVID-19 "google timeline" 
', I see essentially no results.

We all know now what COVID-19 (nCov, Coronavirus) is.  From the reports I see, 
this virus has the unusual characteristic of being very contageous for up to 
periods of weeks prior to a person's feeling symptoms.  That is presumably how 
a large fraction of a cruise ship became infected.  This is quite ominous.  If 
epidemiologists were to ask a patient, "tell us where and when you've been each 
minute over the last 15 days"  the vast majority of these victims wouldn't have 
a prayer of providing that information.  And even worse, finding the other 
people who were "in that AM/PM at 5:07-5:21 10 days ago" would be essentially 
impossible.   Or potentially dozens of other involved locations, over those 15 
days.  

Before one of you accuses me of "advocating" the use of Google Timeline to 
track potential cases of COVID-19 by means of Google Timeline, I don't need to 
"advocate" it.  Rather, I simply point out that there are a lot of people out 
there scared of this virus, and probably be looking for a way to determine if 
their paths have crossed with a victim, even if that victim wasn't symptomatic 
for 1-2 weeks after the contact.  So at some point, I think there will be 
discussion of this possibility.   The data is already being collected, in all 
Android phones (is there an Apple equivalent?)  In principle, if a new infectee 
is identified, it would be technically possible to work backwards, figure out 
where he has been over the relevant period, and find anybody who was close to 
him during a multi-week period.  

One reason this could be important is that there may be a drug which might 
reduce (or, hopefully, eliminate) a person's contageousness if it taken during 
this pre-symptomatic period.   One possibility is an old anti-malarial drug, 
chloroquine, which I have mentioned before.   
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074550  
  But if people only begin taking chloroquine when they begin exhibiting 
symptoms  of this new flu, that means that they will be spreading that virus 
for as much as two weeks, or even more.  In principle, hundreds of people could 
be infected, directly or indirectly, merely because there is no early warning.  


 Suppose you receive a text or email notification that you were in a small 
store, 5 days ago, with a person who just developed symptoms of COVID-19.  You 
MIGHT be infected.   So, you MIGHT want to take a chloroquine pill.  (The 
half-life of chloroquine is 45-55 days).  Or some other pill that could assist 
if taken long before symptoms were likely to appear.  Not only might you not 
get sick, maybe you'd be able to avoid transmitting the virus to many others.  
(My speculation...)   And maybe you'll live, when you otherwise wouldn't.   

We Cypherpunks are SUPPOSED to be more concerned, than average, about the 
privacy and freedom implications of technologies.  What I have described, 
above, might be handled in a completely-voluntary fashion.  But, we want to 
ensure that this doesn't turn into a permanent form of tracking.  So we should 
debate the implications of all this, ideally before everyone else is talking 
about it.

I would be surprised if Google isn't already considering something like this.  
They have much of the data to do so.   They might hesitate to announce such an 
idea, for fear that people would think this is some sort of generalized 
people-tracking system.  

              Jim Bell

Reply via email to