On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:07:35PM -0400, lolwut wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: cypherpunks [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Zig the N.g > Sent: Sunday, 26 April, 2020 12:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: JewTube's CEO Wojcicki: "anything that would go against World Health > Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy" - [PEACE] > and [HEALTH] > > > Harr de harr harr, stright from The Ministry's Department Of Our Forever > > Bracked Overlords - JewTube be keepin dey information LameStream: > > > > Jewess Who Runs JewTube Vows to Censor Anything That Contradicts Doctor WHO > > > http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/jewess-who-runs-jewtube-vows-to-censor-anything-that-contradicts-doctor-who/ > > [snip] > > > > https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-ceo-well-delete-anything-that-contradicts-word-health-organization-on-covid-19 > > > Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of YouTube, announced that all content > contradicting the Word Health Organization (WHO) on the coronavirus pandemic > will be removed from the video platform. > > > During a CNN interview last Sunday, Wojcicki explained there was “a 75 > percent increase in the news coming from authoritative sources since the > beginning of 2020. So, we have seen a lot of demand there.” > > > “But then we also talk about removing information that is problematic,” > she continued. “Of course, anything that is medically unsubstantiated. So > people saying, like, take vitamin C, you know, take turmeric, like, those are > — will cure you. Those are the examples of things that would be a violation > of our policy.” > > > She then specified that “[a]nything that would go against World Health > Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so > remove is another really important part of our policy.” > > [snip] > > Zenaan, while I don't appreciate all the Daily Stormer links that you're > always leaving here, you managed to make me upset with this story.
The Z.g <ahem> will take that as a mathematical complement. > I was on YouTube a lot during its early years (i.e. the 2000s), and it was > like a beacon of freedom when compared to how it is now. I always think that > the rampant censorship on the site cannot get any worse, now that things as > commonplace as "insulting language" are against the site's rules, but every > now and then (like today, with this article) I hear news of yet another way > that censorship on YouTube has increased. > > Apologies for rambling; I just have some very fond memories of the old, free > YouTube, and it troubles me greatly whenever I learn that free speech on the > site has been restricted yet again. (I don't care what Twitter, Facebook, and > every other social media site does, but, please, leave YouTube be...) Aye. We must replace it one day.
