On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 10:21:50PM -0500, Cari Machet wrote: > Transition is a false dichotomy
Thank you - that's an interesting proposition. I'm working on grokking this, will try to understand... > Paper Money was invented in China and they soon realized it could be faked > and banned it > > Life is a build > > The problem with bitcoin and blockchain is that the government can become > that also but we cannot let that deter the process > > We build a new structure as they are taking on our old structure > > Everything is always at play not in stasis > > Anarchist rule ????? Wtvf anarchy is not about ruling and it’s so fucked up > to write that please clear your conditioning ASAP I guess my conditioning is more to the "anarchy = chaos" colloquial term ... yes, the "rule" of anarchy is no rules or "laws" whatsoever - just personal responsibility, private (party party) agreements. I struggle to escape the looming fear that "real anarchy", due to the present, say average state of consciousness of humans, would descend into survival of the fittest - so perhaps this "anarchist rule" phrase comes from a fear of "being ruled by thugs", which, irony of ironies, is what we to a real degree suffer under in today's fake-democracies of course ... I have much to work on internally (including fear), so really, thank you for the reminder! > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:04 PM Zig the N.g <zigger...@yandex.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:15:52AM +1000, Zig the N.g wrote: > > > On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 03:29:14PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > > > > On Sun, 3 May 2020 21:03:22 +1000 > > > > "Zig the N.g" <zigger...@yandex.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > One of the ways to reinforce a nation against such predatory > > oligarchical financial rule, is a state-run development bank, > > > > > > > > fascist spam, like the rest of Z.g's spam > > > > > > > > > It's a possible transition step, in the context of the existence of a > > government, rather than anarchist rule. > > > > > > Another possible step is printing your own currency rather than > > borrowing every dollar from private banks - JFK tried this, although it's > > not overly dissimilar to creating a federal development bank which issues > > its own "credit" - in Australia, this is even in our constitution at the > > state level, although prior to the thieves at Bretton Woods, we also did > > this with our Commonwealth Bank, and were thus the ONLY nation to come out > > of World War II with ZERO debt. > > > > > > Funny how printing your own money means you don't anyone shit. > > > > "... you don't -owe- anyone shit." > > > > > > Also, our real challenge is how to transition from the world we are > > actually in - we cannot begin from utopia, although it may be useful to lay > > out some of the parameters for your own version of utopia, as then we can > > think clearly about how to transition from here, to there. > > > > > > > > > Rothschilds did not like that though, and so we Aussies were brought to > > heel at Bretton Woods. > > > > > > The technical term for this is "shit show". > > > -- > <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb> > cari machet > about.me/carimachet > <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
