‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:39:47PM +0000, other.arkitech wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Just touching base with the cypherpunk lists. > > Indeed I am quite frustrated with the list, but who cares, > > Well, various questions have been asked of you, and pathways for conversation > suggested, by a few folks on the list, and only a few of these you have > pursued. > > That is OK of course, it is your choice in which way you engage in > communication with anyone. > Thanks for recalling. I am not aware of what I missed to answer or pursue. AFAIK I answered to many questions, if I missed any was not intentinal. Other thing is whether or not it goes somewhere. > But when serious questions, suggestions and the like are put to you, and it > looks like you don't answer, or don't attempt to answer deeply, then normal > humans make natural assumptions e.g. "he is evasive" or "he is superficial". I've never been evasive, why would I have transmitted that? And one can never be deep enough in regular talk. It is psychology I guess, you shoot me a deep question and I correspond with a deep answer. Similarly for a superficial question I guess. > > > I think this project deserves interest (like many other out there this is > > true), but at least I'd like to say I am alive and still evolving the > > project. > > Last time I surfaced I was anpha-11, now I am compiling alpha-22; it's a > > long way to the top if you wanna rock'n roll. > > I've post this in reddit, calling for alpha testers. > > https://www.reddit.com/r/US_Public_System/comments/gev3g7/looking_for_alpha_testers/ > > If you know about crypto and have explorer soul and you're so kind, please > > help me constructively to make this tech mainstream. It could pay off. > > This is your "value proposition", which sounds (at least superficially) like > an attempt to appeal to greed. There are more possible interpretations. My main motivation is to make the greener, more efficient, fairer or less-biased and the most distributed crypto platform in the market, that can be used mainstream for managing the world wide society in a flat way, progressively approaching to a substitution of old governments based on hierarchical accumulation of power. > > > On other matters, how are you doing?, anyway, Thanks for your feedback, no > > matter negative or positive. > > Best wishes and regards, > > -- > > Other Arkitech > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > One suggestion you seem to have not properly tackled is your deep > foundational motivations - so far, the best some of us could gather is "move > government taxation to the blockchain" along with some vague notion that > "there's a slightly better way to do taxation, and my project will facilitate > that". I explained taxation. Which I understand as voluntary pay for service. Then I see that's a blocker idea and a mistake I made speaking first about it, because has been completely misunderstood. This project is not meant to be used as a tool for govs. It is a mean to substitute govs. > > That's a bit flimsy though. > > And it may have nothing to do with what you're about - but that would be > whose job to clarify? my job I guess. So I suggest to forget about taxation because it is taken in the wrong direction. It was my fault to have started describing a 'paying pattern' with the same word just because the money would be used to fund shared interests. > > Good luck, Thanks
