Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:43 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:19:26AM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 7:03 AM, Zenaan Harkness [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:05:01PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 22:27:57 +0000
> > > > "other.arkitech" [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > > > > For those who like to play a different game in the private sector, a
> > > > > product fit to them will be supplied.
> > > > > If you only tolerate Free software is fine, your choice. For me being
> > > > > open to what exist is essential for survival and rise.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think free software is far superior to anything else. But that's
> > > > not because I'm a commie like stallman.
> > >
> > > For the record, Richard Stallman is very pro commercial software, making
> > > money from your software development, etc - in fact this is fundamental
> > > since his very beginning of the "modern" Free Software movement over 30
> > > years ago.
> > > A lot of people misunderstand this.
> > > Stallman says "make as much money as you can from free software, just
> > > make sure it's free software".
> >
> > yes :)
> > Free speech, not free beer
>
> :)
>
> Which is why, when non-free software is presented with only a promise of
> "it'll be free libre at some unknown point in the future, but 'before version
> 1.0'", some folks are naturally skeptical :D
at the end of the day any development of any product is nothing but a promise.
Some trust must be in place during such a time.
The remaining choices are ignore and/or wait till the product is well mature
and adopted (a.k.a missing the early-bird bus)
