I'll try to think on that a little before countering with the idea of holding belief of multiple viewpoints without conflict.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 1:39 AM Zig the N.g <zigger...@yandex.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:48:08PM -0400, Karl wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 4:29 PM Punk-Stasi 2.0 <pu...@tfwno.gf> wrote: > > > > > > I have schizophrenia. > > > > > > > > > > so you believe the lies of 'scientists' regarding the > fascist > > > flu > > > > > scare. And you believe the lies of the worst scumbags on the > planet, > > > the > > > > > psychiatrists, when they tell you that you're crazy? Well I guess, > why > > > > > would any sane person believe what his enemies tell him? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because they are struggling to tell him the truth, > > > > > > So you believe the worst kind of technocratic lies used to > control > > > you? And you're asserting that those patent lies are "the truth"? > > > > > > well I guess, again, in that sense, you are detached from > reality. > > > If you believe what your masters tell you, you are insane. Now, how > can you > > > oppose your masters if you believe their propaganda? > > > > > > > I guess I need to wrap my head around people saying the opposite of what > is > > true? > > > The Z.g approves! > > Such may be at times challenging, confronting, liberating, enlightening > and a bit of a wild ride. > > But, the alternative is to never doubt "your superiors" ... and more > fundamentally, to suffer the consequences of never doubting "your > superiors" ... >