On Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:05:10 PM PDT, grarpamp
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/28/20, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Starlink's speed tests may look impressive, but experts say SpaceX's
> satellite-internet project is unlikely to win any federal subsidies
> "https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-starlink-beta-speedtest-results-bandwidth-ping-latency-fcc-rdof-2020-8
> Jim Bell's comment:
> I doubt SpaceX NEEDS any Federal subsidies for Starlink. If it is a working
> system (and these reports seem to show that it works well) then it will
> provide competition to the incumbent wire- or fiber Internet services we
> have been locked into for too long.
>If they accepted an assortment of major cryptocurrencies such as
Bitcoin, Bitcoin_Cash, Monero, Zcash, etc
and enabled fully prepaid service and user owned prepaid hardware,
they might get a lot more customers around the world from those.
More customers = less subsidies. And accepting cryptocurrency
is a big marketing win that matches Starlink's tech image.
I'm hoping that Starlink management will become rather UNcooperative with the
various nations in which their customers reside. Unlike fiber-line internet,
which must "play nice" with the tyrant-in-chief for fear he will cut them off,
in principle Starlink could smuggle in their "UFO on a stick" devices, which
could be hidden and thus operate "unauthorized".
I talk to a person who communicates with Philipines and Cambodia, and
apparently those governments will simply turn off the Internet in those
countries. I have also read that India is rather quick on the 'off switch' in
neighborhoods. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50819905
I wonder if a small village could share a single Starlink device, running a
WiFi router for local distribution.
Jim Bell
