No shortage of examples of Western "transparency":
Russia slams ‘disgraceful’ ban on founding OPCW chief speaking at UN
Security Council on Syria, PUBLISHES his speech unilateraly
https://www.rt.com/russia/502709-former-opcw-director-douma-ban/
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 06:56:19PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> The West, first by just asking/accusing and this time via OPCW "offer that
> you can refuse"ing, continues to try to press Russia to give up all her
> information and investigation records about the Navalny bullshit.
>
> Why would they continue to do this?
>
> If you want to weave a hoaxasaurus story around the facts, you cannot do that
> properly without the facts, because your story WILL come undone, just as
> Germany's part in the Navalny hoax has already changed their story from
> "novichok after effects in his body fluids" ('body fluids' keeps their door
> open should the Russians have failed to collect one or another "bodily fluid"
> for testing, e.g.), to their 2nd story about "Novichok on a water bottle" - a
> water bottle that materialised into the second story, whilst not existing in
> the first story).
>
> And if you really want to slam home your hoax, you want to attack more than
> one "failure" by (in this case) the Russians to test every avenue of possible
> testing.
>
> You see, if the Russians did in fact fail to test EVERY avenue of possible
> "novichok" testing in Navalny - which is almost a certainty since would you
> test (e.g. via tissue sample) EVERY organ in Navalny for (specifically)
> novichok poisoning if you were a Russian doctor? (Just think how many there
> are - from lungs, to kidneys, liver, heart, eyes, muscles, joints, hair,
> tongue etc etc etc)?
>
> And so of course if Russia acts like idiots and gives up the information they
> DO have (e.g. may be their tested urine and liver functioning somehow), THEN
> the west will weave their bullshit around those possible tests that Russia
> FAILED to do but (constructed in hindsight) the West magically "oh yes, we
> did THOSE tests come to think of it, it's a wonder we did not release that
> info publicly before now".
>
> Some would say that the above should not be said - giving ideas to possible
> future nefarious people.
>
> But we're dealing with highly compromised Western officials all over the
> place, as we see with the MH-17 completely unjust and flawed and anything but
> fair "hearing", the Skripal hoax, endless Russia demonization, and now this
> Novichok 2 point 0, and it is important that anyone who DOUBTS the nasty
> nefarious arsehole-ness of Western "leaders" and "officials", can see a clear
> and straightforward path to how the West is trying desperately to create
> Novichok hoax 2.0.
>
> It is presumably a fair assumption the Russians won't fall for such bullshit,
> and already they have called for Germany to release the paperwork on why they
> are making their bullshit Novichok hoax 2.0 claim in the first place, which
> of course Germany is refusing to do since compromised.
>
> If Russia DID fall into trusting the West on this event, they would
> absolutely pay the price with the West in short order releasing the tests the
> West "did do" <ahem, cough cough/> and which the Russians "ought" to have
> done, and would thereby sow the seeds of plausible doubt into the minds of
> millions of gullible MSM followers.
>
> Plausibe doubt, plausible deniability, negative averments by any other name,
> also 'evil' by another name.
>
> Stay calm, stay alert, never shift ground. The west in its INjustice and
> EVIL, shall eventually pay the price, and deservedly so.
>
> OPCW Offers to Send Experts to Russia to Support Investigation Into
> Navalny's Poisoning
>
> https://sputniknews.com/world/202010051080673336-opcw-offers-to-send-experts-to-russia-to-support-investigation-into-navalnys-poisoning/
>
>
>
> Again: warning (hopefully obvious) to Russia: do NOT allow OPCW "experts"
> into Russia to "support" or in any other way "investigate" the Navalny
> "poisoning" - the West's foregone conclusion has been laid out very clearly,
> and the West is simply seeking to find post facto "holes" in the Russian
> medico's processes to ram in some plausible doubt. Just do not go there!
>
> And also again, the West in projecting guilt and nefariousness, has
> demonstrated evil, unjust principles, a will to destroy righteousness, and to
> build massive hoaxes against Russia to indict Russia in "the public mind".
>
> Let the West fall on its own sword and DO NOT trust the West for the
> foreseeable future!
>
> If Russia falls into this trap, the consequences are on Russia's heads!
>
> If Russia allows the OPCW into Russia to investigate Navalny, well they
> better have a bloody well thought ought plan to handle the negative averments
> that WILL come Russia's way as a result!
>
> You have been warned!
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:16:26AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > For reference, this is a good take, and prompted the below (apologies for
> > the separate email, forgot to add it in):
> >
> > Germany, Not Russia, Should Answer Questions Over Navalny Case
> >
> > https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/germany-not-russia-should-answer-questions-over-navalny-case
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > May righteousness one day prevail in the Western nations.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:13:03AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > Speaking of "due process" and the presumption of innocence turned upside
> > > down - to the literal presumption of guilt put upon individuals and
> > > entire nations - the degradation of the West, the Western judicial
> > > system, the turning upside down of fundamental principles of justice,
> > > truth and righteousness, is all on full display by German Chancellor
> > > Angela Merkel, the USA, Britain, and also ("of course") NATO, in this
> > > Novichok redux with Navalny.
> > >
> > > (If Navalny got -actually- poisoned with Novichok, that tells us Navalny
> > > was an expendable puppet literally sacrificed for the interests of the
> > > West by his Western handlers; it is more likely it is simply another full
> > > hoax, and that he was not poisoned and has in some way hoaxed this
> > > "poisoning".)
> > >
> > >
> > > The "most generous" view of German Chancellor Angela Merkel in this
> > > instance, is that she is either blackmailed, or in some other way
> > > compromised - pointing the "presumption of guilt" blame finger on Russia
> > > to create this media spectacle, is in no way in Germany's interests, and
> > > the (alleged or actual) poisoning of Navalny is in no way in Russia's or
> > > Putin's interests.
> > >
> > >
> > > Similarly for the other foreign ministers who "weighed in" to accuse
> > > Russia and "demand answers" blah blah blah. Compromise of some sort is
> > > within those who conduct themselves in such evil ways (public
> > > accusations, presumtpion of guilt, demands for "immediate action" blah
> > > blah blah).
> > >
> > >
> > > And similarly for the head of NATO, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg,
> > > must, logically, likewise be either blackmailed or otherwise compromised.
> > > You don't sell your Soul for no reason...
> > >
> > >
> > > How is it that one can make such assertions (that Merkel, Stoltenberg,
> > > etc have sold their Souls) in such confidence?
> > >
> > > The evidence is before us: when a Western diplomat denies to a foreign
> > > government or denies to foreign officials, their right to be presumed
> > > innocent, and denies them their right to due process (to be presented the
> > > "evidence" against them, to assess and refute that evidence), then it is
> > > clear that we are witnessing evil, despotism, an inversion of justice and
> > > the opposite of righteousness.
> > >
> > >
> > > "The West" is supposedly built on principles of justice and fairness: due
> > > process, the right to a fair hearing, the right to be presumed innocent
> > > until otherwise proven guilty, the right to be not slandered publicly,
> > > and more.
> > >
> > > The reality, for whatever reasons, is that Western diplomats (who these
> > > days are mostly anything BUT diplomatic, let alone righteous), sacrifice
> > > righteousness, sacrifice justice, and presume guilt without presentment
> > > of evidence, and they do all this on the alter (from the most generous
> > > possible interpretation) of political expediency.
> > >
> > > This sacrifice of righteousness and sacrifice of justice (supposed
> > > "Western" principles), is evil. We are witnessing evil in action.
> > >
> > > So, we witness evil actions, we witness evil words, and we suffer evil
> > > consequences.
> > >
> > >
> > > We are witnessing these precise actual evils, in the current hoax of
> > > Navalny's hoaxed (or possible actual but no less indicting of the West)
> > > poisoning with "Novichok".
> > >
> > > And because we witness each of these inversions of truth, righteousness
> > > and justice, and we witness these evils, and these evils are done by
> > > Western diplomats, we can see that "our" Western diplomats have become
> > > evil in their conduct. And so "our" diplomats, our "leaders", are in
> > > fact a blight upon the West, a blight upon us, a curse which we must
> > > remove.
> > >
> > >
> > > It is sad for the West that "our" "leaders" conduct themselves in such
> > > evil ways, speak such evil words, and treat our Russian brothers with
> > > such evil.
> > >
> > > The inversion of justice, the inversion of righteousness, the inversion
> > > of truth - all these things are evil, they are abhorrent to the plain
> > > thinking man who seeks righteousness, truth and justice.
> > >
> > >
> > > The most generous possible justification of this Western evil, is "mere
> > > political expediency".
> > >
> > > Political expediency is the most generous interpretation we can make of
> > > these evils.
> > >
> > > In every case, this evil conduct by our Western "leaders", is abhorrent.
> > >
> > > This evil behaviour, implies hidden forces and implies compromises unseen
> > > - possibly blackmails, possibly enticements (money, power), possibly
> > > merely base greed and opportunism, possibly combinations of these evils.
> > >
> > >
> > > By God Russia has the right to protect her interests in the face of
> > > Western evil!
> > >
> > > In the face of the many evils of the West, we pray and pray again that
> > > Russia does indeed protect her interests!
> > >
> > > May the Russian people be released from their Western constitutional
> > > chains.
> > >
> > > May the Russian people be spared further Western evil.
> > >
> > >
> > > The interests of the West, of us all, includes most fundamentally, the
> > > upholding of righteousness, the upholding of truth, and the upholding of
> > > justice.
> > >
> > > We must rid our nations and ourselves of the evils within.
> > >
> > >
> > > We must drain the swamp.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am presently writing submissions in reply for a case in which the
> > > > right to
> > > > be heard (in a court case) is being demanded (by the team I am on,
> > > > against
> > > > the state), and it looks particularly challenging (read, low
> > > > probability of
> > > > success) due to the entrenched statute law which is quite explicit in
> > > > this
> > > > case. Nonetheless, in this case, the question must be asked (something
> > > > like
> > > > "when there is both a law and a regulation, each allowing the self
> > > > represented person to appeal on an issue of "was due process afforded",
> > > > and
> > > > he chooses the law but did not know the regulation, but the law denies
> > > > an
> > > > appeal whereas the regulation allows it, should that self represented
> > > > person
> > > > be denied his right to rehearing just because he did not know the
> > > > regulation,
> > > > but the law section he chose by default says 'if you use this section,
> > > > you
> > > > don't get a rehearing'?").
