Karl wrote: > On 10/12/20, Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stefan Claas wrote: > >> | Stefan, I got: > >> | > >> AgAAAHYwSAAAAO+xQIT5meBNroABRxnwz1nF8Apub/z5OiqCftZUpGTBbcejwe6XQF4lpAnhW9YG > >> | NAl9/zdLkj8FOG2NQmhbx82HXJv1Ju2c1w== > >> | from you. Is this the same encrypted message as the one you sent? I'm > >> expecting that it is. > > AgAAAHYwjgEAACeQYcUutIj71LXOwf6SZU3wiTMAhlKBNAw552GqDynQ4nKtGX2l+5beCjexTFSW > +MTj6dbJhjfTVpRzalwY19NSWrjeFZpy3WLi78oz3Yh/Tt7tLI630KJUO5vlAOqLM8IJmV4//ZeG > 2AQgpofe61FXDm8H/SXRNFGD9K3Y/sIwtFbzGgyNJxEMIILTtkGCuWvr3Ub6nS06m4PuwP4Eeu0a > ObmohUDGnXNuKEiULvyBbP2X05+s5ogXrzN5lh3pAW3q345kWDteqvqdS3o6baVTYthEb63m5dRg > vIPIeto8v0ZBqJ9zZqIGPKlthQ9u0TXHR4xrdUUWKVxZfyOP906PPSmmoc10zQtWR3Bw9rZ3ym9Y > HxXSu8YvnvGqH+IHzn4qYZYh+WywfcNwoygyNVKuswXDSbz1okDq0yMixIoi6at5ZHCJZDmu9KJx > +LwUQWw7FYR9u2TqFsb+/w8snk9SI8gBTQW4jDoDDbGYYySDQqJA4SOhATwEMRuBySZEQbJ+qtlv > zpPl4upnvipG
AgAAAHYwBwIAALj3MZ/ShsJxjdYIfsw22RKVJePXqE4q6+lwN9/WJA+H16C1chNRDPVgNtau4BDj DAfkY7LBXvhyVlORTzJtdglh5FV5Vu+YlcqHGsLzJRxLKJlLVYS1jbU9+4yea2ftG3Yo/fJQXdCH AfLL4ip86KR0fgOj2ih9lXJjQ6tFWIEbWoX6lzEhccCgPgPRciDlv19VGCX66aP2nFIPr0qDVw2c sMMgRCMlsnQKWIWspYX62a7dq7T7hm2uCRo+Ak35vj2KMoOkD4aUutr1XDNJ8wm9XuYN9Dh94sgP /kF6gNPo+kwnul80mPFJWHe/o4Ltpe0ONh5MIG53DOLilKMe7CFn1jKzDEujapxmDhD1Pt4WP59q DlJDk3BMGEplyCQSQYCfK3Ot3NZHcmaIcPhhEzPiBBPw2959T5mYUHstumsjoDx9t+xEmCR0gDdT S2dbMhlTCEsu1g3arsc0p63nmxS/q79y7GwAn024lbYMz/OvSM10L2mjGiIkuYsnn8eKw9kJy0YL M70pysgcBbj9l5/oFjPk/L4bz0omP2DsP0sWfN9Vr5+9/uYbfJ0dG6UBnSXwXxFxq/cBhzwPJdWw Uov/5awa2KOwcRToPX2dMWfRAIIngX9L3mHIW579mxA+ItYy+bHjwhQzccUv2PKyPGGSLwzEjzm3 BjvksacLYb/51Cy2dbtqHQ== > > BTW. NaClbox messages are authenticated, so no one can send you a message > > in > > my name, if they are not in possession of my private key. This avoids then > > also to use signatures, like with GnuPG. > > > > And the IMHO cool thing about NaClbox is that it is much easier to use and > > learn than GnuPG. > > Why do you not use naclbox to communicate all the time? Couldn't it > even be used for the cypherpunks mailing list, if the mailing list had > a shared receiving private key, to verify that each person is saying > what they intend? Well, I often receive message in PGP format, because I still have a key pair for GnuPG. Otherwise I already use NaClbox with friends in Germany, the United States and Canada. :-) Regarding the ML, I think the list-owner would not be amused and probably many subscribers would not like the idea either. For that people could use the Usenet group alt.anonymous.messages with a shared hashed subject (hsub) in order to fetch messages, from a.a.m.. Regards Stefan -- NaClbox: cc5c5f846c661343745772156a7751a5eb34d3e83d84b7d6884e507e105fd675 The computer helps us to solve problems, we did not have without him.
