I'm burning out a bit so I want to add, Please if you have better ideas of what _to_ do, suggest them. Haven't read any proposals yet.
On 10/13/20, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/13/20, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:39:34 -0400 >> Karl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/13/20, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > The information is unknown to the vast majority of tor users, >>> > including >>> > all the tor users who use tor in 'dark markets' and end up in jail. >>> >>> That's important information. You spew a lot of hard to believe >>> extreme interpretations, do you have a link or personal story to back >>> this up? >> >> >> if people knew that tor is a scam they wouldn't use it. That's my >> 'interpretation'. I guess your 'interpretation' is that everybody knows >> that >> tor is shit and they still use it? Because they like to die in jail for >> selling drugs, like ross ulbricht? >> >> also, majority of people know little about computers, let alone a highly >> specialized topic like 'anonymity networks'. Last but not least, sounds >> as >> if you never talked to any tor pusher? This list had/has a few of them... > > punk, it's not helpful to tell people not to use tor. tor _increases > their anonymity_. it _is_ helpful to make sure they know they are > _still not fully anonymous_ using it. We want people using tor, and > understanding that they are still not anonymous. The increased > anonymity reduces the random harm, and increases the flow of free > information. > >> anyway, if you want to make something that actually works, don't bother >> with tor's source but start with the 'conceptual' design. Notice that one >> of >> tor's core 'features' is a handful of 'directory authorities' (owned by >> the >> pentagon of course) - but even if the handful of servers that control the >> network would not be owned by the enemy, they would still be problematic. > > Do you assume that 'feature' can't be pulled out? last i looked it > was more educational institutions than the pentagon, dunno. >
