On 10/15/20, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: >> freedom of association? > > Similar inquiry may be to look at planet from above, > observe any propensity that variations within humanity > may tend to associate more often with themselves, or not. > Consider removal of all government, all borders, maps, > place names... what then of any propensities. > Would humans species not be expected similar to any > observable associative tendencies of variations within species > of animal kingdom... ant colonies, birds, dogs, bacteria, > fish, worms... or not. > > If no associative bias is found, great. > If something is found, then admit it, and that it is unchangeable
each association has contexts and reasons, which themselves have contexts and reasons. > embraceable part of nature for which legislating false morals > or imparting external / unnatural forces, can prove dangerous > due to other things found inherent to nature, such as when > cornering an animal. > >> easier to cooperate if you are of the same > > Then in either case world can return from the > endless subject bullshit back to whatever > cooperation among free animals running about. >
